Thermo - Simple Energy balance equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the General Energy Balance Equation and its application in thermodynamics, specifically in steady-state systems. It emphasizes that energy cannot be created or destroyed, and the term Egen should be interpreted as energy transformation rather than generation. Users are encouraged to analyze energy interactions before applying equations, as different scenarios may require different forms of energy to be considered. The distinction between flow work (pv) and boundary work (∫p(dv)) is clarified, highlighting their relevance in different contexts. Understanding energy conservation is crucial for effectively applying these equations in problem-solving.
ksukhin
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
The General Energy balance equation is:
∑ENin - ∑ENout + Egen = Est (in rate form - don't know how to put the dot above)

I know that Est is 0 when the system operates at Steady State Steady Flow (SSSF).

I have 2 formulas for ΔE in "Q-W = ΔE"
1) ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE
2) ΔE = m[h2 - h1 +(V2-V1)2/2 + g(z2-z1)]
How do I know which one to use in which scenario?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  1. ksukhin said:
    ∑ENin - ∑ENout + Egen = Est
    Dude! There wouldn't be any ## E_(gen) ## term in the energy equation. Energy cannot be created neither can it be destroyed. Though many textbooks write this term but this is not a good habit to follow. It destroys the whole beauty of energy conservation equation. What you interpret as ## E_(gen) ## is actually the energy transformation from one form to other across the system boundary. For example suppose you have an electric heater of 1000 Watt. Instead of interpreting as 1000 J of energy being produced per second, you can interpret it as 1000 Joule of electric energy (from out of the system) coming inside the system and getting converted into heat energy, per second.
  2. For your concern of which equation to use, I will suggest you to stop plugging equations in problems. Rather sit back and think about all the energy interactions going on for 1-2 minutes before actually starting the solution. The only reason, you see so many energy equations is because there are situations when one form of energy is negligible in comparison to others and hence are neglected. For example is the ( ## v^2 ## ) term is very small as compared to the enthalpy terms ( ## h ## ), you can neglect the kinetic energy. You will know this once you choose your system and analyse it. Once you have identified, all the energies being involved, go for the energy conservation law. All you need to remember is that you cannot create energy out of nothing and that you cannot destroy it either.
    So the equation I prefer is $$ ∑E_(in) = ΣE_(out) + Δe $$ where ## E_(in) ## involves all the energy coming inside the system in form of external work, heat input, enthalpy, kinetic energy of incoming fluid etc and similarly ## E_(out) ## will include every outgoing energy. Further ## Δe = e_(final)-e_(initial) ## where ## e ## includes every energy associated with the substance inside the boundary. If you wish to write this in terms of rates, simply differentiate. The differentiation will be rather easy for a specific problem. I mean suppose I consider the enthalpy term, ## H = m* h## , where ## h ## is the specific enthalpy, so in rate form this will simply be mass flow rate multiplied by specific enthalpy.
See in nutshell, all you need to do is know the energy transformations and trust the energy conservation law. Trust me, once you know how to use the energy conservation law properly, these equations will never bother you. You will get used to write your own equation for every case.

I have tried my best to be clear at what I am trying to convey, if there is something I have missed or something I am not clear at, please let me know.
 
  • Like
Likes ksukhin
Thanks for the quick reply!
I was a bit in shock since I have 8 finals in a span of 6 days so I blanked for a minute. I realized what I was doing wrong why i didn't get the equation.

I wasn't accounting for the work done by the fluid ##pv## and since ##h=u+pv## both equations are valid but they're case specific.

I was jumping from an Otto cycle which had QH=u2-u1 and a power plant where they use enthalphy. I just couldn't see that there was a ##pv## term not included because it wasn't needed.

Thanks again. I"m just a bit all over the place cause I'm freaking out
 
Calm down buddy. I have been through same. However just for sake of completion (I think you already know this), ## pv ## is not same as the work ## ∫p(dv) ## .
  • ## pv ## is the flow work and you are correct it comes into picture only when there is flow. Its mainly because of the change in pressure and volume of the fluid at the inlet and exit of a control volume (or any system in general)
  • ## ∫p(dv) ## isthe boundary work associated with the change in volume of the system.
 
  • Like
Likes ksukhin
Vatsal Sanjay said:
Calm down buddy. I have been through same. However just for sake of completion (I think you already know this), ## pv ## is not same as the work ## ∫p(dv) ## .
  • ## pv ## is the flow work and you are correct it comes into picture only when there is flow. Its mainly because of the change in pressure and volume of the fluid at the inlet and exit of a control volume (or any system in general)
  • ## ∫p(dv) ## isthe boundary work associated with the change in volume of the system.

Yup I see the difference now, thanks again! I'll do my best not to panic tomorrow haha
 
  • Like
Likes Vatsal Sanjay
In post #1,

The equations Q-W = ΔE and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE comprise the version of the first law that apply to a closed system (no mass entering or leaving)

The equations ΔE =-m[h2 - h1 +(V2-V1)2/2 + g(z2-z1)]+Q-Ws and ΔE = ΔU + ΔKE + ΔPE comprise the version of the first law that apply to an open system (where mass can be entering and leaving). In this equation, Ws is the shaft work.

Chet
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top