Thermodynamics and simple harmonic motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a horizontal piston-cylinder system containing an ideal gas executes simple harmonic motion when slightly displaced from equilibrium. The angular frequency is derived as ω = AP_{0}/√(MnRT_{0}), where A is the piston area and M is its mass. The net force on the piston is analyzed, leading to the conclusion that the term involving P_{0}Ax can be neglected due to the assumption of small displacements (x/L << 1). This simplification is justified using Taylor expansion, retaining only linear terms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of approximating small quantities in physics to arrive at the correct motion equations.
vladimir69
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal piston-cylinder system containing n mole of ideal gas is surrounded by air at temperature T_{0} and pressure P_{0}. If the piston is displaced slightly from equilibrium, show that it executes simple harmonic motion with angular frequency \omega=\frac{AP_{0}}{\sqrt{MnRT_{0}}}, where A and M are the piston area and mass, respectively. Assume the gas temperature remains constant.


Homework Equations


PV=nRT
F=Ma
P=F/A
x=amount by which piston moves
L=length of cylinder
F = force on piston

The Attempt at a Solution


V_{0}=AL
V=A(L-x)
F_{net}=A(P_{0}-P)
L=\frac{nRT_{0}}{P_{0}A}
P=\frac{ALP_{0}}{V}
Popping all this into the mix gives
F_{net}=\frac{-P_{0}^2A^2x}{nRT_{0}-P_{0}Ax}
M\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\frac{-P_{0}^2A^2x}{nRT_{0}-P_{0}Ax}
If I get rid of the P_{0}Ax} term then we arrive at the correct answer but not sure why one should throw away this term

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The denominator is equal to <br /> nRT_0 (1-x/L)<br />

It is assumed that the piston is only slightly displaced from equilibrium, so that x/L<<1. That means that its second or higher power can be neglected with respect to it.
We often apply this method in Physics when working with small quantities: use Taylor expansion and keep linear terms.
Your expression of force can be written in terms of (x/L),

F=AP_0(1-\frac{1}{1-x/L})<br />

Expanding the the fraction with respect to x/L :

F=AP_0(1-(1+x/L+(x/L)^2+(x/L)^3+...))<br /> <br />

Omitting all terms but linear, we get:

F=-AP_0(x/L)<br /> <br />

ehild
 
ok
thanks for that
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top