Thermodynamics Hydrostatic Pressure as Function of Height Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of hydrostatic pressure as a function of height in fluid mechanics, specifically addressing how the shape of a container and the presence of a movable plate affect pressure readings at different points within the fluid. Participants explore theoretical implications and practical examples related to pressure distribution in static fluids.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how hydrostatic pressure can be independent of the container's shape, suggesting that the area of the container's bottom affects pressure readings.
  • Another participant argues that the walls of the container exert pressure on the fluid, which may contribute to equal pressure readings at the bottom of different shaped containers.
  • There is a discussion about the effect of a ceiling on the fluid pressure, with some participants asserting that the pressure exerted by the ceiling is minimal due to the large area and distribution of forces.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the role of the ceiling and the implications of movable plates on pressure readings, with some suggesting that the ceiling's pressure is equal to the pressure from the water column above.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the theoretical basis for why the ceiling exerts pressure equal to the long column of water, referencing Pascal's principle as a potential explanation.
  • Another participant acknowledges the complexity introduced by the plates and expresses a willingness to set aside that aspect for clarity in understanding hydrostatic pressure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the container shape and the role of the ceiling in determining hydrostatic pressure. Multiple competing views remain regarding how pressure is distributed and the significance of the movable plates.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the assumptions underlying the discussion, particularly regarding the influence of the ceiling and the conditions under which hydrostatic pressure is considered equal across different containers.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and educators in fluid mechanics, as well as individuals exploring the principles of hydrostatics and pressure in various contexts.

f8pc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
How is hydrostatic pressure not a function of the shape of the container? My professor says that the pressure P2 is the same for the figures on the right and left. How does the area of the two sections not matter at all? Clearly, if a plate is inserted of negligible mass, thickness, and buoyancy, the pressure at P2 is not equal (see work under each figure). If the forces without the plate aren't distributed across the area of the bottom pool, then the pressure on the far left or far right of of the bottom pool of the left figure would only be pg*h2 and not pg*(h1+h2).


[PLAIN]http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/6066/hydrostaticpressure.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
f8pc said:
Clearly, if a plate is inserted of negligible mass, thickness, and buoyancy, the pressure at P2 is not equal (see work under each figure).
I don't understand your logic with the movable plate (is it surrounded by fluid?). But if you want to understand how the pressure at the bottom of each container can be the same, be sure to consider that the walls of the container also exert a pressure--in particular, the 'ceiling' of the container on the left exerts a downward pressure on the fluid.
 
Hmm, but the pressure the ceiling puts on the fluid is not that great because it is only a result of the long column of vertical water. The area of the ceiling is quite large so the distribution of the forces from the vertical column would make the force is exerts rather small?Yes, the plates are free to move and are completely surrounded by water. The ceiling in the left picture wouldn't be pushing on the plate as the water above it would push it down.

The ultimate goal of this question is to determine why the pressure at any point on the bottom of the left figure is the same as the pressure at the bottom of the right figure (without the plates. The plates only explain my thinking).
 
f8pc said:
Hmm, but the pressure the ceiling puts on the fluid is not that great because it is only a result of the long column of vertical water. The area of the ceiling is quite large so the distribution of the forces from the vertical column would make the force is exerts rather small?
No, the pressure turns out to be equal at all points at the same level--the ceiling pushes down with a pressure that is equal to the pressure from the long column of water.

Yes, the plates are free to move and are completely surrounded by water. The ceiling in the left picture wouldn't be pushing on the plate as the water above it would push it down.
But the ceiling would be pushing the water down right above the plate. So you're right back where you started.
 
What's the theory behind the ceiling pushing down with pressure equal to the long column of water? Where can I read about why that occurs and why it is equal? Thanks for the quick responses by the way. This was driving me nuts.

It's clear the plates change the system then if the ceiling is pushing down so I am happy to throw that out. I was assuming the only pressure would be from the long column above and the water below.
 
f8pc said:
What's the theory behind the ceiling pushing down with pressure equal to the long column of water? Where can I read about why that occurs and why it is equal? Thanks for the quick responses by the way. This was driving me nuts.
It's essentially Pascal's principle--that the pressure in a fluid (at least in the static case) must be the same in all directions. A fluid cannot support shear stress (at least an ideal fluid cannot).

It's clear the plates change the system then if the ceiling is pushing down so I am happy to throw that out. I was assuming the only pressure would be from the long column above and the water below.
Think about this: If the ceiling didn't press down on the fluid underneath it, then you could remove it with impunity. What do you think would happen then? (The vertical tube just connecting with an open pool of water.)
 
Okay, that helps a lot! I wish I could thank you for helping me in a way other than just saying thanks so much! I really appreciate the time you took to answer each of my questions and doing so in a clear and polite way. You're truly an asset to this forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K