Thermodynamics Ideal gas problem

AI Thread Summary
An isolated box with two chambers containing the same type of dilute gas at different densities and temperatures is analyzed for equilibrium temperature after removing a partition. The left chamber has 1.0 x 10^22 particles at 25 degrees Celsius, while the right has 6.0 x 10^21 particles at 15 degrees Celsius. The heat exchange between the chambers is considered, with the understanding that the heat capacity remains constant due to the same gas type. The total internal energy is calculated using the formula for ideal gases, leading to the conclusion that the equilibrium temperature can be determined by summing the internal energies of both chambers. The discussion emphasizes that the specific type of gas is irrelevant for solving the problem, as the gas properties will cancel out in the calculations.
Ron Burgundypants
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An isolated box contains two chambers separated by a thermally insulating but moveable partition. Both chambers contain dilute gas (same kind) at different densities and temperatures. The left chamber contains 1.0 x 10^22 particles at 25 degrees celsius and the right chamber 6.0 x 10 ^21 particles at 15 degrees celsius. What is the equilibrium temp when the wall is removed?

Homework Equations


PV=NkT
[Left Chamber] (mCv(Tf-Ti)) + [Right chamber](mCv(Tf-Ti))
Maybe the density equation?

The Attempt at a Solution


What I understand;
- The volume is constant
- Chamber left loses some energy this is the same as what chamber right gains
- The Heat capacity is the same as the gas is the same in both chambers so we can forget it.

So I've tried all sorts of things but the problem is I don't know get how the number of particles can be exchanged for a mass seeing as we don't know which type of gas it is, otherwise the problem would be easy right? Just solve for Tf. Should I just use a random gas and get the molar mass etc. or is there a better way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you said, the gas is the same in both chambers, so you don't need to know the molar mass. You are aware that the gases mix after the partition is removed, correct? Do you know how the internal energy of an ideal gas mixture is related to the internal energy of the pure gases comprising the mixture?
 
  • Like
Likes Ron Burgundypants
The internal energy of an ideal gas is the degrees of freedom x NkT right? Not sure how to relate it to the total internal energy though no...
 
just write it out with letters and you will see it all cancels out
Ron Burgundypants said:
- Chamber left loses some energy this is the same as what chamber right gains
 
  • Like
Likes Ron Burgundypants
Ok I tried something and got an interesting answer. Might be right

Sum up the internal energies of both chambers i.e 3/2NRT(left) + 3/2 * NRT(right)

So this is the total internal energy - 3/2 NRT (total) - Solve for T now and I have the equilibrium temperature? Looks about right.

Wrongman I'll try your way too and see what happens if its easier. Thanks guys!
 
Aha! Yes brilliant thanks guys.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top