Thermodynamics - Pressure Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of gauge pressure in relation to a pressure cooker, emphasizing that atmospheric pressure is inherently accounted for when using gauge pressure. It explains that gauge pressure represents the difference between absolute pressure and atmospheric pressure, allowing for the simplification of calculations. The confusion between gauge pressure and vacuum pressure is addressed, highlighting that while both relate to internal and atmospheric pressure differences, they are distinct concepts. Participants express their understanding and seek clarification, demonstrating the educational nature of the exchange. Overall, the thread effectively resolves the initial query regarding the treatment of atmospheric pressure in calculations.
Icetray
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Thermodynamics - Pressure Question

Homework Statement



A pressure cooker cooks a lot faster than an ordinary pan by maintaining a higher pressure and temperature inside. The lid of a pressure cooker is well sealed, and steam can escape only through and opening in the middle of the lid. A separate metal piece , the petcock, sits on top of this opening and prevents steam from escaping until the pressure force overcomes the weight of the petcock. The periodic escape of the steam in this manner prevents any potentially dangerous pressure buildup and keeps the pressure inside at a constant value. Determine the mass of the petcock of a pressure cooker whose operations pressure is 100 KPa gage and has an opening cross-sectional area of 4 mm^2 . assume an atomspheric pressure of 101 KPa, and a draw of the petcock


My Question:

I already have the solution to this question and it is stated that:

Atmospheric pressure is acting on all surfaces of the petcock, which balances itself out. Therefore, it can be disregarded in calculations if we use the gage pressure as the cooker pressure. A force balance on the petcock (ƩFy = 0) yields

Here is the diagram given:

5H40m.jpg


If the atmpospheric pressure is still pushing down on the petcock, how can we just ignore it?


Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Icetray said:
If the atmpospheric pressure is still pushing down on the petcock, how can we just ignore it?
You don't ignore it. You just do not have to take it into account explicitly if you use the gage pressure in the pot. The gage pressure takes it into account for you.

The actual pressure in the pot is Pactual = Pgage + Patm.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
You don't ignore it. You just do not have to take it into account explicitly if you use the gage pressure in the pot. The gage pressure takes it into account for you.

The actual pressure in the pot is Pactual = Pgage + Patm.

AM

Thanks for your reply Andrew Mason!

So basically whenever the term gauge pressure is used, it gives you the difference between the internal and atmospheric pressure?

I thought that was P_{vacuum}? My notes shows a diagram of P_{vacuum} and P_{guage}. The P_{vacuum} one shows like it gives you the resultant pressure between the atmosphere and the internal pressure (image below) which looks more like what we have in the diagram in my first post.

1ruSW.jpg


I apologize if I'm not making any sense but I'm still very lost even though I understand what you're saying. ):
 
Icetray said:
So basically whenever the term gauge pressure is used, it gives you the difference between the internal and atmospheric pressure?

I thought that was P_{vacuum}?
As your diagram says:
P_{gauge} = P_{abs}-P_{atm}
P_{vac} = P_{atm}-P_{abs}
So, while Pgauge and Pvac both "give the difference between internal (abs) and atmospheric pressure", they are not the same.
 
Redbelly98 said:
As your diagram says:
P_{gauge} = P_{abs}-P_{atm}
P_{vac} = P_{atm}-P_{abs}
So, while Pgauge and Pvac both "give the difference between internal (abs) and atmospheric pressure", they are not the same.

Ah! I feel so silly now. :-X Anyways thanks guys! (:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top