Thermodynamics problem help again

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enoch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving the heating of helium gas at constant volume. The user correctly identifies the process as isochoric and applies the formula for heat transfer, Q = Cn(Tf - Ti). However, they mistakenly fail to multiply the result by the number of moles of helium, which is 4.22. The correct calculation should yield a heat transfer value that is 4.22 times larger than their initial answer. The user seeks clarification on their setup and calculation, highlighting a common misunderstanding in thermodynamic equations.
Enoch
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Sorry for the second question in just a day, but my proffessor really didn't cover this material very well. Thanks for any help given :).

A cylinder contains 4.22 mol of helium gas at a temperature of 314 K. The molar specific heat of helium at constant volume is 12.5 J/K mol. How much heat must be transferred to the gas to increase its temperature to 531 K if it is heated at a constant volume? Answer in units of J.

Well, after reading the problem, I knew that it was an Isochoric Thermal process due to the comment "heated at a constant volume". Therefore this equation applies:

Change in Internal Energy = Q - W
- The work is going to be 0 joules
- Amended equation: Change in internal Energy = Q

Q = Cn(Tf - Ti)
- Solving for that: Q = (12.5)(531 - 314) = 2712.5

I plugged that in as my answer, and it was wrong. Where did I go wrong? Is the problem even setup right from my perspective?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Enoch said:
Sorry for the second question in just a day, but my proffessor really didn't cover this material very well. Thanks for any help given :).

A cylinder contains 4.22 mol of helium gas at a temperature of 314 K. The molar specific heat of helium at constant volume is 12.5 J/K mol. How much heat must be transferred to the gas to increase its temperature to 531 K if it is heated at a constant volume? Answer in units of J.

Well, after reading the problem, I knew that it was an Isochoric Thermal process due to the comment "heated at a constant volume". Therefore this equation applies:

Change in Internal Energy = Q - W
- The work is going to be 0 joules
- Amended equation: Change in internal Energy = Q

Q = Cn(Tf - Ti)
- Solving for that: Q = (12.5)(531 - 314) = 2712.5

I plugged that in as my answer, and it was wrong. Where did I go wrong? Is the problem even setup right from my perspective?

Brilliantly,up until the final calculation.U forgot to multiply by the number of moles of He.Your result should ve been 4.22 times larger.It's awkward,because u stated the formula right. :wink:
 
dextercioby said:
Brilliantly,up until the final calculation.U forgot to multiply by the number of moles of He.Your result should ve been 4.22 times larger.It's awkward,because u stated the formula right. :wink:

Again, thanks very much.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top