Thermodynamics question: Irreversible process

AI Thread Summary
In an adiabatic irreversible expansion, the gas transitions from state (P1, V1, T1) to (P2, V2, T2), with V2 greater than V1, leading to P2 being less than P1 and T2 being less than T1. The discussion emphasizes that while there is only one reversible adiabat for each state, the irreversible process does not follow the same path, resulting in less work done and a higher internal energy at state 2 compared to a reversible scenario. The relationship PV^γ = K applies only to reversible processes, and for irreversible processes, the internal energy change must be accounted for differently. The area under the curve in a PV diagram represents work done, which is less for irreversible processes compared to reversible ones. Ultimately, the final state must reflect these thermodynamic principles while considering the unique characteristics of irreversible processes.
libelec
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A gas expands through an adiabatic irreversibly process, from (P1, V1, T1) to (P2, V2, T2). In a PV graphic, localize both states 1 and 2, and the adiabats that pass through each of them.

The Attempt at a Solution



It's a theory question. I can locate 1 anywhere I want, but to locate 2 I have to follow the rules of thermodynamics. If the gas expands, then V2 > V1. This is what I have so far.

Now the question is P and T. I thought that, even though it's an irreversible process, there's only one adiabat that goes from 1 to 2, since adiabats don't cross each other. So, if I tried to go from 1 to 2 through a reversible adiabatic process, I could only take that adiabat. Then P2 < P1.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're saying there's only one adiabat that goes from 1 to 2.

Are you sure this is correct? Because you're saying there is one reversible adiabatic process while the question asks for an irreversible adiabatic process. How would these two processes differ? Think about this for a minute.
 
That is the very same root of my question. What is the difference for this? What's the difference in terms of calculations?
 
well volume is inv. proportional to pressure, so pressure will decrease. temperature, on the other hand, is dir. proportional, so it will also increase.
 
Unless it's a trick question or I have misunderstood something you have neglected the term irreversible. To be fair I've never heard of the term adiabat but I assume it means the exponential PV-line for an adiabatic reversible process. Only reason I do this is because I have an idea of what they might be looking for. If I'm wrong just disregard my post unless you left some information out of the question.

The area below a curve in a PV diagram such as the curve during an irreversible (or reversible) expansion is equal to the work done. Draw such a curve for an adiabatic reversible process from point 1 to the volume at 2. Now the question is will the curve for the irreversible process be above or below the previously drawn curve? Here you have to think about what irreversible means and how it relates to work. To finish off just draw a somewhat paralelle curve from point to to the volume at 1 (paralell to the first adiabat you drew).

I think it is an ill posed question and I may certainly have misunderstood.
 
Yes, that's what I meant with adiabat.

I know that in a reversible process, the work done is maximum, so I assume the curve should be below the other one. But still, I don't understand how this helps me with how to locate point 2. It (the location) still lingers from the hypothesis I made at the beginning.
 
Anybody?
 
You have to use the relationship between P and V during an adiabatic process:

PV^\gamma = K

AM
 
So, let me see: PV\gamma must remain constant. Even though it's an irreversible process, this stands, right? So, then, since V2 > V1 and \gamma remains the same, then P1 > P2. Same with the temperature, because from PV\gamma = TV\gamma-1, and \gamma - 1 remains the same, then, because of the same as before, T1 > T2. Is this correct?

And how about the adiabats in each point? Is is the same adiabat that goes from 1 to 2 like I said, or are there two different adiabats?
 
  • #10
libelec said:
So, let me see: PV\gamma must remain constant. Even though it's an irreversible process, this stands, right?
No. It applies to an adiabatic process that is in constant equilibrium - i.e reversible. In irreversible adiabatic process, such as a free expansion of a gas, the relation does not hold.

So, then, since V2 > V1 and \gamma remains the same, then P1 > P2. Same with the temperature, because from PV\gamma = TV\gamma-1, and \gamma - 1 remains the same, then, because of the same as before, T1 > T2. Is this correct?

And how about the adiabats in each point? Is is the same adiabat that goes from 1 to 2 like I said, or are there two different adiabats?
There is only one reversible adiabatic curve through each point. It is the curve defined by the adiabatic condition PV^\gamma = K. So you have to draw the adiabatic curve from point 1. Where is point 2 in relation to the adiabatic curve through point 1?

AM
 
  • #11
Then I'm in the same situation than before. I know that V2 > V1, so then V2\gamma > V1\gamma (since both are positive magnitudes). But I can't find a way to relate both Ps.
 
  • #12
libelec said:
Then I'm in the same situation than before. I know that V2 > V1, so then V2\gamma > V1\gamma (since both are positive magnitudes). But I can't find a way to relate both Ps.
Use PV=nRT

All you can do in answering this question is to first identify two points (P1,V1,T1) and (P2,V2,T2) connected by a possible irreversible adiabatic expansion path from 1 to 2. To do this you draw the reversible adiabatic path through 1. This is governed by the adiabatic condition:

PV^\gamma = K

which, since T = PV/nR, can be expressed:

TV^{\gamma-1} = PV^\gamma/nR = K/nR

If the process is not reversible less than the maximum potential work will be done. Since it is adiabatic, this means that the internal energy will be higher than in the reversible path. Use that to locate the possible points (P2,V2,T2) that result from an adiabatic irreversible path.

AM
 
  • #13
OK, let me know if this is OK, please:

I choose a random point 1:

1zgbww1.jpg


Then, I draw the adiabat that goes through 1:

2w4wk1l.jpg


If this was a reversible process, then the blue 2 would be point 2. But now, since the process is irreversible and as a consecuence the work made by the gas is lesser, then the internal energy in 2 will be greater. As a consecuence, the temperature of point 2 must be higher than the temperature of the blue 2. Say the two isotherms Ta and Tb are such that Ta < Tb. Then (moving the blue 2 higher):

2d6s803.jpg


Point 2 will be located in the isoterm Ta, since it has a larger amount of internal energy (left?). Then finally this is what I have:

23mrbjq.jpg


With each point associated with two different isotherms T1 and T2. Then there should be a different adiabat that goes through 2.

Is this correct?
 
  • #14
If the final temperature is higher for a given volume, the final pressure will be higher. The path, however, results in less work being done. This means the area below the path is less than the area below the reversible adiabatic path.

AM
 
  • #15
But there's no way that point 2 is associated to a P2 higher than that of the blue 2, because there's no path from 1 to that 2 that encloses a smaller area than the path from 2 to the blue 2.
 
  • #16
libelec said:
But there's no way that point 2 is associated to a P2 higher than that of the blue 2, because there's no path from 1 to that 2 that encloses a smaller area than the path from 2 to the blue 2.
Sure there is. For example, if P drops to P2 immediately and expansion occurs at P = P2, the work done will be less. Or, if P drops to 0 immediately and pressure gradually increases as expansion occurs, the work done will be less (this is what occurs when a gas expands into a chamber that is initially at 0 pressure (vaccum).

AM
 
  • #17
And that can still be done adiabatically?
 
  • #18
Sure. Just make the process thermally isolated from the surroundings. As the gas expands, the internal energy will decrease by the amount of work that is done (dQ = 0, so dU = -dW). A reversible expansion (the gas is in thermodynamic equilibrium at all times) results in the maximum amount of work being done. So that is the limiting case. The work done is a function of the external pressure. If the external pressure is between 0 and P1 the gas will expand until the internal and external pressures are equal.AM
 
  • #19
I've got it. Thank you very much.
 
Back
Top