Thermodynamics Rigid tank problem

AI Thread Summary
A closed, rigid tank containing water at 20 bar and 80% quality is cooled to 4 bar, prompting a calculation of heat transfer. The internal energy change was determined using specific internal energies at both pressures, yielding a change of -97.786 kJ/kg. The specific volume was calculated to find the mass of the water, resulting in 6.255 kg. Multiplying the mass by the change in internal energy gave a heat transfer of -611.65 kJ, which does not match the professor's answer of -8282 kJ. Clarification is sought on the discrepancy in results.
jorsh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A closed, rigid tank filled with water, initially at 20 bar, a quality of 80%, and a volume of .5 m^3, is cooled until the pressure reaches 4 bar. Evaluate the heat transfer, in kJ, and draw the process in a T-v diagram


Homework Equations


ΔU=Q-W (but W goes to zero here because of the constant volume)
u= ugX + (1-x)uf
v= vgX + (1-x)vf

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so. I know that the volume is constant. My plan was to use the quality to calculate specific internal energies at 20 bar and 4 bar, thus finding the change in internal energy.
I ended up with u1(20 bar) = 2261.528 kJ/kg and u2(4 bar) = 2163.742 kJ/kg using the above equation using quality.

However, it wants the answer in kJ, so I had to find the specific volume to find the mass to cancel the kJ/kg. So, i used vg and vf at 20 bar (using the equation v=vgx + (1-x)vf) and I got .07993934 m^3/kg. I divided the given .5 m^3 by the specific volume I got, and received the answer of 6.255 kg. I then multiplied this by the change in internal energy, which I found to be -97.786 (cooling process, makes sense).

The final answer I calculated was -611.65 kJ. My professor gave the answers in class so we could check, but did not go through the problems specifically. This answer does not agree with his answer of -8282 kJ. Maybe -82.82? I have it written down as -8282.

Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top