Thermoelectric (copper and iron at 1000C)

AI Thread Summary
When a heat source raises the temperature to 1000°C in a vacuum chamber with copper at the center and iron surrounding it, a temperature gradient is established, with copper being hotter than iron. This difference in temperature can generate a voltage through thermoelectric effects. The discussion seeks equations related to thermoelectric voltage production under these specific conditions. The provided link may offer additional insights into thermopower calculations. Understanding the thermoelectric principles involved is crucial for harnessing this temperature differential effectively.
evan manalu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1429256766.155928.jpg


Like attachment above
When heat source give heat until 1000degree celcius
Copper at center of cylinder iron
Copper will hotter and iron will colder because ambient air
Chamber is vaccum
So there are different temperature between copper and iron
How voltage will produce according to thermoelectric?
Any equation about this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thank you for help..
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top