Thermoelectric Generator Experiment

AI Thread Summary
To convert a thermoelectric Peltier cooler into a weak thermoelectric generator, a temperature differential must be created across the device. It is advised to either heat the hot side and cool the cold side or vice versa, as the direction of current will change but the generation of electricity will still occur. Maintaining the temperature difference within specifications is crucial to avoid damaging the element. The generated electromotive force (emf) relies on the temperature difference rather than absolute temperatures. Successful experimentation has shown that both configurations can effectively produce current and power small devices.
SirBerr
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to turn a thermoelectric peltier cooler I recently bought into a weak thermoelectric generator. (I bought this one https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002UQQ3Q2/?tag=pfamazon01-20 ) .

I built a basic series circuit with 2 3V batteries and a 1 Ω resistor and this so I could determine which side was the cool side and which side was the hot side and labeled them accordingly.

Now, I don't want to ruin the the piece but would like to convert it into a weak electrical generator by. To do this, I understand I have to create a temperature differential across the device, my question is, am I supposed to heat the hot side and cool the cold side, or am I supposed to heat cool side and cool what is the hot side in order to produce an electric current.

If I had to guess, I would heat the hot side and cool the cold side. Any advice is appreciated! Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are in a good position to experiment.
If you keep your temperature difference within specification you will not damage the element.
 
As far as I know, the emf generated depends on the temperature difference and not the absolute temperatures. So you can either heat one junction or cool the other.

And it doesn't matter which side you heat or cool. Changing the hot and cold juntions only reverses the direction of the current.
 
It did work, got a small engine to spin, in both directions with opposite polarity. Thanks for everyone's input.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top