Solving Circuit Problems with Thevenin's Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of Thevenin's Theorem in circuit analysis, particularly when multiple power sources are involved. It clarifies that when analyzing circuits with more than one power source, the superposition principle allows for considering one source at a time, with deactivated voltage sources becoming short circuits and current sources becoming open circuits. The user expresses confusion regarding the impact of a third power source on the circuit, specifically whether the voltage between points A and B would be zero. The standard procedures for calculating Thevenin equivalents, including determining open circuit voltage and short circuit current, are briefly mentioned. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the principles of superposition and Thevenin's Theorem for effective circuit analysis.
skiboka33
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I'm working on some circuit Problems involving Thevenin's Theorem. When there is only one power source it seems pretty straight forward, but I'm a little confused when another power sources is added. Does it matter if a second power source is facing the opposite direction of the first?

I kind of understood the idea that you consider only one powersource at a time, but I just need some clarification. Thanks.

There is also a more challenging circuit problem (at least to me) in which a third powersource is added, this one is on a branch apart from the circuit which leads to the point A (a dead end). This is part of the system of points A,B for which the thevenin circuit is being constructed. Does this mean the Vab considering only this powersource is zero? thanks again, sorry if my description is confusing.

EDIT: should have put this in help with homework section, feel free to move it. I'd do it myself but I don't know how
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anything would help, thanks...
 
The standard procedure for calculating Thevenin equivalent circuits are as follows;

1. Calculate the Open Circuit Voltage V_{OC} - This is the voltage the appears between the terminals when no load is connected between them.

2. Calculate the Short Circuit Current I_{SC} - This is the current that flows through the terminals when they are shorted (i.e. connected with no resistance in between).

3. The Thevenin equivalent resistance can then be calculated using

R_{TH} = \frac{V_{OC}}{I_{SC}}

Claude.
 
skiboka33 said:
I kind of understood the idea that you consider only one powersource at a time, but I just need some clarification. Thanks.

That's the idea. It's called superposition. If all your circuit elements are linear then you can break your 2-source circuit into two 1-source circuits and add the results for open circuit voltage (or short circuit current, if you are doing a Norton conversion). Just remember that deactivated independent voltage sources become short circuits and deactivated independent current sources become open circuits.

This of course can be extended to n-source circuits.

EDIT: should have put this in help with homework section, feel free to move it. I'd do it myself but I don't know how

Only a Staff member can do it. ZapperZ or Doc Al may decide to do it, but I wouldn't worry about it. The idea of having a Homework section is to reserve the Physics section for interesting discussions. You're asking about general principles (Thevenin and superposition) rather than specific problems.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top