Thickness of lead required for 200 keV x-rays?

ireland01
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
is this correct?

mass attenuation coeff. = 8.636 cm^2/g

8.636 * (density of lead: 11.3 g/cm^3) = 975.868 per cm

thickness (mm):

t= 9.21 / 975.868

= 0.009 cm

= 0.09 mm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where does the factor of 9.21 come from?
Assuming your coefficient is right, and you want 9.21 radiation lengths, the answer looks right.
 
I found that factor online.It said to get intensity to < 1% but by my calculations, for 200 KeV beam using formula:
HVL = 0.693/u

need 7 HVL layers to get to 0.8% which is 4.48 mm.
where u = 10.15 cm^-1
 
Last edited:
4.5mm looks better, and the new prefactor 7*ln(2) looks better as well.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top