Thoughts Experiment about Frame of References

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of frames of reference through a series of problems involving an observer in a moving car and a bird flying at different speeds and accelerations. For the first two scenarios, the velocities of the bird relative to the observer are calculated using Galilean transformation, resulting in -20 km/h and 10 km/h, respectively. The acceleration of the bird in the third and fourth scenarios remains unchanged at 10 km/h² and 40 km/h², as acceleration is invariant under Galilean transformation. The participants clarify the application of these transformations without delving into Lorentz transformations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding relative motion in different frames of reference.
kasha
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Observer (me) is at Inertial Frame of Reference:

1)
I am sitting at a car moving east v=30 km/h relative to earth
A bird flying east v = 10 km/h relative to earth
What is the speed of bird for me?

2)
I am sitting at a car moving east v=30 km/h relative to earth
A bird flying east v = 40 km/h relative to earth
What is the speed of bird for me?

3)
I am sitting at a car moving east v=30 km/h relative to earth
A bird flying east accelerating at a=10km/h2 relative to earth
What is the acceleration of the bird relative to me?

4)
I am sitting at a car moving east v=30 km/h relative to earth
A bird flying east accelerating at a=40 km/h2 relative to earth
What is the acceleration of the bird relative to me?

Please feel free to correct any stupidity/misconceptions I might have introduced in my questions

Homework Equations


Frames of Reference

The Attempt at a Solution



1) I think (-20km/h)...if the car and the bird started at the same spot, after 1hr, I would have traveled 30 km to the east, while the bird would have traveled only 10km to the east, so the bird is lagging behind me by 20km..looking as the bird is moving 20km/h to the west!2) I think (+10km/h)...if the car and the bird started at the same spot, after 1hr, I would have traveled 30 km to the east, while the bird would have traveled 40km to the east, so the bird is a head of me by 10 km..looking as the bird is traveling 10km/h to the east!

3) 10 km/h2 ?!
4) 40 km/h2 ?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me.
 
Doc Al said:
Looks good to me.
Thanks but I was looking for more explanation.

for question (1 & 2). we simply use Galilean Transformation (let's not worry about Lorentz transformation)
The Galilean transformation gives the coordinates of the point as measured from the fixed frame in terms of its location in the moving reference frame.
The fixed frame is the Earth, the point moving is the bird, the frame moving (car)
but for the observer inside the car (the fixed frame is the car, the moving frame is the Earth moving at -30 km/h, the point moving is the bird)

x' (position of bird in moving frame "Earth") = x (position of bird measured from my frame "car") - vt (velocity of moving frame "Earth" with respect to mine)

for velocity transformation, we differentiate by t:
d(x')/dt = d(x)/dt - d(vt)/dt
v' (velocity of bird relative to Earth) = v (velocity of bird relative to car) - vs (velocity of car relative to Earth which is -30)

1)
10 = v - (-30)
v = -20 km/h (velocity of bird relative to car)

2)
40 = v - (-30)
v = 10 km/h (velocity of bird relative to car)

for (3&4) the acceleration transformation of the Galilean will be:
a' (acceleration of bird relative to Earth) = a (acceleration of bird relative to me)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top