Throwing Objects - Motion in Two Dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to projectile motion, specifically parts c and d. Participants express confusion about how to discuss part c, which requires calculations involving angle and speed to determine maximum height. There is a consensus that the angle should be close to 45 degrees, but not exactly, unless specific conditions are met. Calculations for maximum height are debated, with some participants questioning the accuracy of their results, particularly regarding the influence of gravity. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of the problem and the need for careful consideration of kinematic equations.
mustafamistik
Messages
35
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
It's not homework
Relevant Equations
1/2*g*t^2
I stuck on part c and d. My attemption is attached.
 

Attachments

  • S3.PNG
    S3.PNG
    33.3 KB · Views: 153
  • Attemption.jpeg
    Attemption.jpeg
    37.8 KB · Views: 167
Physics news on Phys.org
Part c) says "discuss" and I don't see any discussion. I can't work out what your answer to d) is either.
 
PeroK said:
Part c) says "discuss" and I don't see any discussion. I can't work out what your answer to d) is either.
Is my solving way correct for part a ? I don't know how to discuss part c, what logic should I think?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
mustafamistik said:
Is my solving way correct for part a ? I don't know how to discuss part c, what logic should I think?
What is your answer for part a)?
 
PeroK said:
What is your answer for part a)?
It's attached.
 
  • Sad
Likes PeroK
mustafamistik said:
It's attached.
45 degrees?

That said, this is a strange problem. The answer must be close to 45 degrees, but it cannot be exactly 45 degrees, unless you take ##g = 10 m/s^2##.
 
PeroK said:
45 degrees?

That said, this is a strange problem. The answer must be close to 45 degrees, but it cannot be exactly 45 degrees, unless you take ##g = 10 m/s^2##.
I rounded it. It comes from 4,9/5*tan^2... equation.
 
mustafamistik said:
I rounded it. It comes from 4,9/5*tan^2... equation.
Rounding or not makes a big difference to part c).
 
PeroK said:
Rounding or not makes a big difference to part c).
Understood. Actually i wonder if my solution way is correct. For part a.
 
  • #10
mustafamistik said:
Understood. Actually i wonder if my solution way is correct. For part a.
It looks okay to me.
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
It looks okay to me.
Thanks. I don't know how to discuss part c, what logic should I think?
 
  • #12
mustafamistik said:
Thanks. I don't know how to discuss part c, what logic should I think?
It wants calculations: angle, speed gives max height.
 
  • #13
In maximum height vertical speed must equal to 0.
##V_0*sin(45)/g= t##
##(V_0*sin(45)*t)-(1/2*g*t^2)=H_{max}##
##(V_0*sin(45)*(V_0*sin(45)/g))-(1/2*g*(V_0*sin(45)/g)^2)=H_{max}## ...
Is this way true ? for part C.
 
  • #14
mustafamistik said:
In maximum height vertical speed must equal to 0.
##V_0*sin(45)/g= t##
##(V_0*sin(45)*t)-(1/2*g*t^2)=H_{max}##
##(V_0*sin(45)*(V_0*sin(45)/g))-(1/2*g*(V_0*sin(45)/g)^2)=H_{max}## ...
Is this way true ? for part C.
Can you not tidy that up? You should get a simple formula for max height if ##\theta = 45°##
 
  • #15
PeroK said:
Can you not tidy that up? You should get a simple formula for max height if ##\theta = 45°##
I don't know how to do that.
 
  • #16
mustafamistik said:
I don't know how to do that.
It's basic kinematics. ##v^2 - u^2 = 2as##

Or, in this case ##v_y^2 - u_y^2 = 2a_ys_y##
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
It's basic kinematics. ##v^2 - u^2 = 2as##

Or, in this case ##v_y^2 - u_y^2 = 2a_ys_y##
##0-(5*sqrt(5))^2=2*H_{max}## ?
Then ##62.5=H_{max}##
But is result too big ?
 
  • #18
mustafamistik said:
##0-(5*sqrt(5))^2=2*H_{max}## ?
Then ##62.5=H_{max}##
But is result too big ?
Isn't there a little thing called gravity involved in the calculation? And isn't the angle involved too?
 
  • #19
PeroK said:
Isn't there a little thing called gravity involved in the calculation? And isn't the angle involved too?
Sorry. You're right.
##0-(5*sqrt(5)*sin(45))^2=2*g*H_{max}## =4.46
Yes seems to be true .
 
  • #20
mustafamistik said:
Sorry. You're right.
##0-(5*sqrt(5)*sin(45))^2=2*g*H_{max}## =4.46
Yes seems to be true .
I thought you were trying to find whether ##H_{max} = 3m## or not.
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
I thought you were trying to find whether ##H_{max} = 3m## or not.
Yes, according to my calculations ##H_{max}## bigger than 3m
 
  • #22
For part D. Radial component is zero, tangential component is ##g## of acceleration. Am i wrong?
 
  • #23
mustafamistik said:
Yes, according to my calculations ##H_{max}## bigger than 3m
Okay, but you may want to check your calculations: ##4.46m## is too high.
 
  • #24
mustafamistik said:
For part D. Radial component is zero, tangential component is ##g## of acceleration. Am i wrong?
I assume that's right. It's an odd question, as it has little relevance to the specific problem.
 
  • #25
PeroK said:
I assume that's right. It's an odd question, as it has little relevance to the specific problem.
I understand. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
535
Replies
9
Views
883
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top