How does friction affect the results of the ticker tape experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shinks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The ticker tape experiment demonstrates how imperfections in a ramp, such as bumps or grooves, can cause deviations in the recorded acceleration, appearing as shorter distances between the ticks on the tape. Friction acts as a retarding force, impacting the cart's motion and resulting in non-uniform acceleration. To compensate for friction, adjustments can be made, such as altering the ramp's angle or adding a mass that is not included in calculations. The experiment typically aims to show uniform acceleration, which is disrupted by any obstacles. Understanding these effects is crucial for accurate analysis of motion in physics experiments.
shinks
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I did the ticker tape experiment.

Made a ramp, attached ticker tape to the end of a cart, thread the tape through the ticker timer, let the cart roll down the ramp ^.^''

My question; let's say my ramp had an imperfection, like a bumb or groove. How would that show up on my ticker tape? What would it look like?

And also the experiment was designed to compensate for the effect of friction. Can you explain how this was done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A bump or groove would show up as a deviation from uniform acceleration. Don't you compensate for friction in the usual way by using an air track? Or is it more exotic?
 
When the cart accelerates down the track the distances between ticks will grow constantly. When it encounters an obstacle in the track the cart will be slowed down momentarily. This will be made visible on the tape as a shorter distance between the ticks as the cart was slowed down momentarily.

Friction introduces a force that will retard the motion of the system. To eliminate its effects one needs to add a force to the system that cancels it out. In the case of the ramp this might be achieved by offsetting the angular measurement of the ramp or introducing a mass that is not used in the calculations.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top