Time Dependence of the Infinite Square Well

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the normalization of the wave function for an infinite square well, specifically addressing the wave equation Ψ(x,t) = A[ψ_1 + ψ_2] where ψ_1 and ψ_2 represent the first two energy levels. The normalization constant A is derived as A = sqrt(1/a) after integrating the squared wave function. A key point of confusion is clarified: the time dependence of the wave function is introduced through the exponential factors exp(-i E_n t / hbar) for each stationary state, which was initially overlooked. This correction is crucial for deriving expectation values that oscillate over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions.
  • Familiarity with the infinite square well model in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for integration of trigonometric functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy levels in the infinite square well model.
  • Learn about time-dependent wave functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of expectation values and their physical significance.
  • Review the orthonormality of wave functions and its implications in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, particularly those tackling problems related to wave functions and the infinite square well model. This discussion is also beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of time dependence in quantum systems.

Odysseus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question comes straight from Intro to QM by Griffiths (pg 29, Q 2.6).

A wave equation is given representing an even mixture of the first two energy levels of the infinite square well. The task is to normalize the wave function, state it explicitly and then derive some expectation values.

Homework Equations



The wave equation is
Ψ(x,o)=A[ψ_1+ψ_2]

where ψ_1 and ψ_2 are the first and second stationary states in the one dimensional infinite square well. ψ_n=sqrt(2/a)*sin((n*pi*x)/a), where a is the length of the interval.

The Attempt at a Solution



For convenience I set β=pi/a

(1) the normalization:
(A^2) ∫|Ψ(x,o)|^2 dx (x=0 to a) = 1

Which works out to

(A^2)[∫(sin(βx)^2)dx + ∫(sin(βx)*sin(2βx))dx + ∫(sin(2βx)^2)dx] = 1

The different wave functions are orthonormal which cancels the middle integral and the other two are just the normalization integrals for the individual energy levels, thus.

(A^2)[(a/2)+(a/2)] = 1

A=sqrt(1/a)

(2) Explicit statement of wave function and |Ψ(x,t)|^2

Ψ(x,t)= sqrt(1/a)[ψ_1+ψ_2]e^(-iωt)

Now here is my main question, the problem calls for |Ψ(x,t)|^2 to be written in terms of sinusoidal functions of time, but

|Ψ(x,t)|^2 = ΨΨ*

so

ΨΨ*= (1/a)[(ψ_1+ψ_2)^2](e^(-iωt))(e^(iωt))

ΨΨ*= (1/a)[(ψ_1+ψ_2)^2]

because the exponentials cancel. There is no time dependence. There must be though because in the question immediately following, which asks for <x>, says that the value oscillates in time.

The math in the book is a little out of my comfort zone so it is completely possible that I've missed something trivial.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression for Ψ(x,t) is incorrect. The wavefunction Ψ(x,t) is a sum over the stationary states ψ_1(x) and ψ_2(x), with both states multiplied by their respective exponential time factors, exp(- i E_n t / hbar), where E_n is the energy of the n-th stationary state.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot, Eric. It makes much more sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K