Time-Dependent Classical Lagrangian with variation of time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the derivation of the variation of the Lagrangian, specifically in the context of the calculus of variations. The user is struggling with incorporating an additional time variation, \(\tilde{t} = t + \delta t\), into the standard derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equations. They attempt to define \(\delta L\) using partial derivatives but encounter discrepancies in the results compared to the reference equation (10.1). A suggestion is made to consult an attachment that provides an introduction to the calculus of variations, although it does not address coordinate variations. The user is ultimately directed to a specialized textbook for further clarification.
586
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I was reading the following review:

http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2009-4&page=articlesu23.html

And I got stuck at the first equation; (10.1)

So how I understand this is that there are two variations,

\tilde{q}(t)=q(t)+\delta q(t) \hspace{1cm} \text{and} \hspace{1cm} \tilde{t}=t+\delta t

Further we also have a `total variaton' for q at first order:
\tilde{q}(\tilde{t})=q(t)+\delta q(t)+\dot{q}(t)\delta t

and its derivative,
\dot{\tilde{q}}(\tilde{t})=\dot{q}(t)+\delta\dot{q}(t)+\ddot{q}(t) \delta t

So now how is \delta L(q,\dot{q},t) defined?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your question about the paper, or about the fundamentals of the calculus of variations?

If the latter, see the attachment at https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=752726#2

It contains a leisurely introduction to the calculus of variations, followed by derivations of Lagrangians & Hamiltonians.
 
The question is about the fundamentals of calculus of variations. I know how to derive the usual Euler-Lagrange equations without the extra variation in t \tilde{t}=t+\delta t. But I am having trouble incorporating this extra variation.

if i define:
\delta L = \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \delta q + \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \frac{\partial q}{\partial t}\delta t + \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot{q} } \delta \dot{q} +\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \frac{\partial \dot{q}}{\partial t}\delta t + \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} \delta t

then it gets a similar result as (10.1) but everywhere there is \dot{q} they have -\dot{q}.

Its driving me pretty crazy. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Then download the attachment ...
 
Unfortunately the attachment does not treat coordinate variations.
 
Then you will need to find a specialized textbook.
 
Back
Top