586
- 4
- 0
Hello everyone!
I was reading the following review:
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2009-4&page=articlesu23.html
And I got stuck at the first equation; (10.1)
So how I understand this is that there are two variations,
\tilde{q}(t)=q(t)+\delta q(t) \hspace{1cm} \text{and} \hspace{1cm} \tilde{t}=t+\delta t
Further we also have a `total variaton' for q at first order:
\tilde{q}(\tilde{t})=q(t)+\delta q(t)+\dot{q}(t)\delta t
and its derivative,
\dot{\tilde{q}}(\tilde{t})=\dot{q}(t)+\delta\dot{q}(t)+\ddot{q}(t) \delta t
So now how is \delta L(q,\dot{q},t) defined?
I was reading the following review:
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2009-4&page=articlesu23.html
And I got stuck at the first equation; (10.1)
So how I understand this is that there are two variations,
\tilde{q}(t)=q(t)+\delta q(t) \hspace{1cm} \text{and} \hspace{1cm} \tilde{t}=t+\delta t
Further we also have a `total variaton' for q at first order:
\tilde{q}(\tilde{t})=q(t)+\delta q(t)+\dot{q}(t)\delta t
and its derivative,
\dot{\tilde{q}}(\tilde{t})=\dot{q}(t)+\delta\dot{q}(t)+\ddot{q}(t) \delta t
So now how is \delta L(q,\dot{q},t) defined?
Last edited by a moderator: