Time Evolution for particle with potential suddenly removed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem from Statistical Mechanics involving the time evolution of a quantum harmonic oscillator's wavefunction after the potential is abruptly removed. The initial wavefunction is transformed into momentum space, leading to the application of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation with a new Hamiltonian representing a free particle. The goal is to find the spatial wavefunction at time t>0 by projecting the evolved wavefunction back onto position space. A participant realizes that the necessary terms for the transformation are the plane wave solutions for a free particle. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying Fourier transforms to obtain the desired spatial wavefunction.
Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



This is a problem from my Statistical Mechanics book by Pathria.
[/B]
At ##t=0##, the ground state wavefunction of a one-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator with potential ##V(x)=\frac{1}{2}\omega_0^2 x^2## is given by,

\psi(x,0)=\frac{1}{\pi^{1/4} \sqrt{a}}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2a^2}}

where ##a=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m \omega_0}}##. At ##t=0##, the harmonic potential is abruptly removed. Use the momentum representation of the wavefunction at ##t=0## and the time-dependent Schrodinger equation to determine the spatial wavefunction and density at time ##t>0##.

Homework Equations


i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi=\hat{H} \psi

The Attempt at a Solution



So first I took the Fourier transform of the wave function given at ##t=0## to get,

\Phi(k,0)=-\frac{\sqrt{a}}{\pi^{1/4}}e^{\frac{1}{2}i a ^2 k^2}

So now that at ##t>0## the potential is removed, the new Hamiltonian is that of a free particle. I want to see how the original wave function evolves with time with this new potential. So I will multiply it by the time evolution operator.

\Phi(k,t)=\Phi(k,0)e^{-i \frac{\hat{H}t}{\hbar}}=\Phi(k,0)e^{-i \frac{\hat{p}^2 t}{2m\hbar}}

Generally, we can write this as,

|\psi(t)>=e^{-i \frac{\hat{p}^2 t}{2m\hbar}}|\psi_0>

The whole goal is to find the spatial wave function so let's project it onto ##x##.

<x|\psi(t)>=<x|e^{-i \frac{\hat{p}^2 t}{2m\hbar}}|\psi_0>

What is given in the beginning of the problem is ##<x|\psi_0>## so I do the following.

&lt;x|\psi(t)&gt;=\int &lt;x|e^{-i \frac{\hat{p}^2 t}{2m\hbar}}|x&#039;&gt;&lt;x&#039;|\psi_0&gt;dx&#039;

Now, the Hamiltonian in the exponential purely depends on the momentum operator, so it would be easiest to deal with momentum eigenkets. So I will insert two more identities in there.

&lt;x|\psi(t)&gt;=\int &lt;x|p&#039;&gt;&lt;p&#039;|e^{-i \frac{\hat{p}^2 t}{2m\hbar}}|p&gt;&lt;p|x&#039;&gt;&lt;x&#039;|\psi_0&gt;dx&#039;dpdp&#039;

&lt;x|\psi(t)&gt;=\int &lt;x|p&#039;&gt;e^{-i \frac{p^2 t}{2m\hbar}}\delta(p&#039;-p)&lt;p|x&#039;&gt;&lt;x&#039;|\psi_0&gt;dx&#039;dpdp&#039;

&lt;x|\psi(t)&gt;=\int &lt;x|p&gt;e^{-i \frac{p^2 t}{2m\hbar}}&lt;p|x&#039;&gt;&lt;x&#039;|\psi_0&gt;dx&#039;dp

My problem is, I do not know what ##<x|p>## and ##<p|x'>## are. I remember back when I took quantum mechanics dealing with these types of terms but for the life of me I cannot remember what their value is or why! If anyone can help I would greatly appreciate it!

EDIT:
A ha! I just realized that these terms are simply the plane wave solution to the free particle! I will go though it now to make sure I have no other issues.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. I think you're taking a detour here...
You obtained the full wave function in momentum space:
Φ(k,t ) = Φ(k,0)⋅exp(–ik2t/2m)
(remember in momentum space p-hat is just p, not a differential operator)
So to get the spatial wave function, just take the inverse Fourier transform.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top