Time taken for energy to drop 95% in damped SHO

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a damped simple harmonic oscillator, specifically examining the energy decay of an oscillating mass-spring system. The original poster seeks to determine the time taken for the energy to drop to 5% of its initial value, alongside calculating the frequency of damped oscillation and the percentage decrease in amplitude per cycle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster has calculated the frequency and percentage drop in amplitude but questions the validity of their time calculation for energy decay, suspecting a potential error in their approach or in the provided solution.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a review of the original poster's calculations, with one participant affirming the time value of 21.2 seconds as plausible. There is also a discussion regarding the units of the damping coefficient, indicating a need for clarity on this aspect.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations compared to a provided solution, indicating a potential discrepancy that remains unresolved. The discussion includes a focus on the non-linear nature of energy decay in damped oscillations.

Phynos
Messages
31
Reaction score
4
There is a post about the same problem here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/damped-oscilating-spring.12838/

It was helpful for solving part B.

1. Homework Statement


A 10.6kg object oscillates at the end of a vertical spring that has a spring constant of 2.05x10^4 N/m. The effect of air resistance is represented by the damping coefficient b = 3.00Ns/m.

(a) Calculate the frequency of the damped oscillation.

(b) By what percentage does the amplitude of the oscillation decrease in each cycle?

(c) Find the time interval that elapses while the energy of the system drops to 5.00% of it's initial value.

Homework Equations



1. x = Ae^(bt/2m) cos(wt + phi)

2. (From post mentioned above): %Difference = 1 - e^(bt/2m) * 100%

The Attempt at a Solution



I have completed part (A): frequency is 7Hz and (B): Percent drop is 2%.

For part (C) I tried solving the second equation above for t, then subbing in difference of 0.95.

I end up with t = -(2m/b) ln(1-D)

solving when D = 0.95 gives me:

t = 21.2s

This is exactly double the solution in the back. Why is it not the same? I didn't insert a factor of two anywhere, the two in the equation is meant to be there.

Is the back wrong? Or am I making a stupid mistake somewhere? It's more likely that I've made a mistake but I've been looking at it awhile now and I'm stumped.

---

I also tried multiplying the time taken to drop 2% (The period, sqrt(k/m) ) by 47.5 but then I end up with:

t = 6.97s

I realized after this would not work because the decrease in energy is not linear, hence the exponential term in the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Phynos, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Looking at your method I can't find fault. t = 21.2s seems like a correct value to me. Of course, I stand ready to be corrected by someone more clever than I :smile:

I do have one nit to pick, and that's with the units of the given damping coefficient. I think they should be Ns/m rather than Nm/s. Usually the air resistance force is modeled as being proportional to velocity in this type of problem, so b*V should yield Newtons.
 
Thanks.

[Ns/m][m/s] = N

The units are in Ns/m in my post. Perhaps you misread, unless you meant they should not be? But I think they are correct.
 
Phynos said:
Thanks.

[Ns/m][m/s] = N

The units are in Ns/m in my post. Perhaps you misread, unless you meant they should not be? But I think they are correct.
Ah. My apologies. I think I must have been confused by Klion's post (which you linked to).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
981
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K