Tips for Improving Quantitative Score on the GRE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need to retake the general GRE due to the expiration of previous scores. The participant expresses frustration over the time commitment required for GRE preparation, especially while engaged in a research project. They share their recent practice test scores, noting a higher verbal score than quantitative, which is atypical for a physics student. Key advice includes focusing on test-taking strategies that prioritize speed, such as estimating answers rather than calculating precisely, and practicing with GRE-specific problems to become familiar with the test format. It is emphasized that achieving a high quantitative score, ideally close to 800, is expected for physics candidates. Participants recommend reviewing math concepts that may not be regularly used in their studies and utilizing prep materials that cover test strategies and common question types. Overall, the importance of practice and adapting to the GRE's unique demands is highlighted.
Quark_Chowder
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I posted before about possibly retaking the physics GRE, but now I have a question about the general GRE.

First of all, I took the general GRE years ago, and scored well as I recall, but ETS drops scores after 5 years, so I have to retake the booger :mad: I mean, there are sooooo many other things I could be spending my time on (specifically, a research project I'm in the middle of); instead, I'm facing a pile of Kaplan, Barron, Princeton Review, etc. books with practically zero motivation to actually do anything in any of them.

That said, I did take the Princeton Review's online GRE CAT test today:

Verbal 780/800
Quant 640/800

Yes, you read that right. I somehow scored higher on verbal than on the math section (largely because I ran out of time on the test). Yes, I'm a physics student.

Any tips for improving my quantitative score?

I keep telling myself I have to get an 800. 800 is pretty much expected for us physics folk, right?

Thanks, y'all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you ran out of time on the math, the most likely reason is because you are not following the stupid strategies that you need to follow for these tests. Like, on certain problems where you're asked a question involving variables, it will save you time to just "plug in 1000" for x or something like that, even though the very thought makes me want to puke, you just have to swallow any sense of elegance to save the time. Similar thing with the data questions; those can be a real time consumer if you try to calculate exactly the answer. You kind of need to rush and estimate.

Is it your first practice test? The GRE math should be easy, but if you need to take a few practice tests to get used to their pattern, that's normal.

Besides this, it's possible there is some area you are not comfortable with, so you should try to figure out exactly what that is...it's true that 800 or close to it is expected. I don't know whether schools have a strict cut off, but it seems like a bad place to push your luck.
 
Last edited:
I took the GRE a month ago, and was happy with my scores (720 verbal, 760 math). What helped me study for math was reading the math strategies section of my GRE prep book (I think I used the ARCO brand) and reviewing the math concepts that I never have to use as an engineering student (specifically, permutations, combinatorics, and geometric series).

Learn the recommended test-taking strategies, dumb as they might seem, because the GRE is not a regular test, and even if you're a good test-taker in real life you might do poorly on the GRE.

Do practice problems to work on your speed.

Remember that some of the math questions will be easy to solve, but have some kind of logical "trick" to them. My prep book went over some of these trick questions, I believe.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top