To show a module M = direct sum of Image and kernal of automorphism

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of an R-module M and a homomorphism φ from M to itself, specifically addressing the condition under which M can be expressed as the direct sum of the kernel and image of φ. The original poster attempts to demonstrate that if φ is idempotent (i.e., φ ∘ φ = φ), then M can be decomposed into the kernel and image of φ.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of φ acting as the identity on the image of φ and discuss the injectivity of φ. They raise questions about the existence of unique decompositions of elements in M and the implications of having multiple decompositions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and exploring various interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between elements in the image and kernel, but no consensus has been reached on the injectivity of φ or the uniqueness of the decomposition.

Contextual Notes

There is a consideration of the implications of the injectivity of φ on elements of M, as well as the potential for multiple decompositions of the same element, which raises questions about the assumptions being made in the proof.

rachellcb
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let R be a unital commutative ring. Let M be an R-module and [itex]\varphi : M \rightarrow M[/itex] a homomorphism.

To show: if [itex]\varphi \circ \varphi = \varphi[/itex] then [itex]M=ker(\varphi)\oplus im(\varphi)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have already shown that [itex]M=ker(\varphi)\cap im(\varphi) = {0}[/itex], so now I am trying to show that if [itex]m \in M[/itex] then m=m1+m2 where m1 [itex]\in ker(\varphi)[/itex] and m2 [itex]\in im(\varphi)[/itex]

So far I have shown that [itex]\varphi[/itex] acts as the identity function on elements of [itex]im(\varphi)[/itex] and that [itex]\exists[/itex] m1, m2 with [itex]\varphi[/itex](m) = m2 then [itex]\varphi[/itex](m) = [itex]\varphi[/itex](m1 + m2) but I can not see a way to show that [itex]\varphi[/itex] is injective so this does not necessarily mean that m=m1+m2.

Not sure if I am using a good approach or not... Any hints or suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
φ is injective on im(φ). You've already figured out that m2 must be φ(m). Doesn't that mean m1 must equal m-φ(m)?
 
Thanks, I see that φ(m) = φ(m1) + φ(m2)
⇔ φ(m1) = φ(m) - φ(m2)
⇔ φ(m1) = φ(m - m2)
⇔ φ(m1) = φ(m - φ(m))

But neither m1 nor m need be in the image of φ, so injectivity does not necessarily apply, right?
 
Suppose m has two decomposition m=m1+m2=m1'+m2'. That means φ(m2)=φ(m2') where both m2 and m2' are both in im(φ). What does that say about m2 and m2'?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
13K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K