To show a module M = direct sum of Image and kernal of automorphism

rachellcb
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let R be a unital commutative ring. Let M be an R-module and \varphi : M \rightarrow M a homomorphism.

To show: if \varphi \circ \varphi = \varphi then M=ker(\varphi)\oplus im(\varphi)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have already shown that M=ker(\varphi)\cap im(\varphi) = {0}, so now I am trying to show that if m \in M then m=m1+m2 where m1 \in ker(\varphi) and m2 \in im(\varphi)

So far I have shown that \varphi acts as the identity function on elements of im(\varphi) and that \exists m1, m2 with \varphi(m) = m2 then \varphi(m) = \varphi(m1 + m2) but I can not see a way to show that \varphi is injective so this does not necessarily mean that m=m1+m2.

Not sure if I am using a good approach or not... Any hints or suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
φ is injective on im(φ). You've already figured out that m2 must be φ(m). Doesn't that mean m1 must equal m-φ(m)?
 
Thanks, I see that φ(m) = φ(m1) + φ(m2)
⇔ φ(m1) = φ(m) - φ(m2)
⇔ φ(m1) = φ(m - m2)
⇔ φ(m1) = φ(m - φ(m))

But neither m1 nor m need be in the image of φ, so injectivity does not necessarily apply, right?
 
Suppose m has two decomposition m=m1+m2=m1'+m2'. That means φ(m2)=φ(m2') where both m2 and m2' are both in im(φ). What does that say about m2 and m2'?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top