Torque direction rule and metamaterials

  • Thread starter Thread starter metalore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the determination of torque direction, specifically why natural materials predominantly follow the right-hand rule while man-made metamaterials can exhibit left-handed properties. It is noted that the right-hand rule is a convention, yet the underlying reasons for the natural preference remain unexplained. The left-hand rule is associated with certain artificial materials that have a negative refractive index, raising questions about the fundamental differences in composition or structure between natural and synthetic materials. Participants highlight that while the choice of rule is a matter of convention, it does not clarify why natural materials consistently adhere to the right-hand rule. The conversation ultimately seeks to understand the intrinsic factors that dictate these directional properties in materials.
metalore
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I´m new. I actually found this board with the message about speculative theory about the density of space and its relation to time but I see that post is two years old.

Anyway I have another simple question that I just can´t find the answer to.

What determines the direction of torque!?

Is this just an unexplained phenomenon of the universe? I understand that the torque direction of all natural materials can be determined by using the right-hand rule. However, the left hand rule is also used but only for certain man-made left-handed or negative index materials.

I also understand this is related to "metamaterials" which have a negative refractive index and are not natural but man-made. Are there any natural occurring materials that use the left-hand rule for torque but are not metamaterials (i.e. have a normal refractive index but still use the left-hand rule for torque)?

What is determining this direction, and why do all natural materials use the right hand rule?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Refractive index has nothing to do with torque. Can you give an example of a material that uses the left-hand rule for calculating torque?

Really, you can use the left-hand rule instead of the right-hand rule if you want, as long as you are consistent, and as long as you distinguish between polar vectors (ordinary vectors) and axial vectors (vectors that are calculated from the cross product of two polar vectors).

Right-hand vs. left-hand is merely a sign convention. We could also, for example, choose all of our velocities to be negative. It wouldn't affect the physical results (but it might be more cumbersome to calculate with).

Also, left-handed torque would be used in left-handed coordinate systems (which could be what you're referring to). But this has no bearing on the actual physics; it's just a bookkeeping device.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I haven´t really read about anything that uses the left hand rule for torque. But I have read about materials that use the left hand rule for opposite wave propagation and a negative refractive index (are those two related)?

I wonder if these are really torque-like properties being expressed on a microscopic level? In any case, my original question still stands: Why do naturally occurring materials use the right-hand rule and not the left (Whether it be torque, wave propagation, or refractive index)? What determines this direction? All I read is that using the right hand is a "convention", but it does not explain why everything goes in that direction in the first place. The fact that materials which use the left-hand rule are "unique", begs the question what is determining this direction in the first place?

I do know that artificially creatd metamaterials are able to produce the negative refractive index because of man-made changes in the structure of the material (as opposed to composition). But what was in the composition of all natural materials in the first place that makes them all use the right-hand rule.

Admittedly I should have titled this thread "Right-hand rule vs left-hand rule" since this is not just about torque.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top