Torque equilbrium involving support rod?

AI Thread Summary
A uniform 300-kg beam is supported by a strut and has a load suspended from its end, with a maximum compression of 23,000 N allowed in the strut. The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum mass that can be suspended while maintaining torque equilibrium. The initial attempt involved summing torque moments but was incorrect due to not properly accounting for the upward force exerted by the strut. The corrected approach includes using the net torque equation, factoring in the upward force and the geometry of the setup. The final calculation yields a maximum load mass of approximately 788 kg.
genessis42
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform 300-kg beam, 6 m long, is freely pivoted at P. The beam is supported in a horizontal position by a light strut, 5 m long, which is freely pivoted at Q and is loosely pinned to the beam at R. A load of mass is suspended from the end of the beam at S. A maximum compression of 23,000 N in the strut is permitted, due to safety. In Fig. 11.1, the maximum mass M of the load is closest to:

11.1.jpg

Homework Equations



Net Torque=0
Net Force=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried adding up all of the torque moments and then setting them equal to 23,000N.

300(9.8)(3m)+0(Pivot arm)+6m(mg for the mass)=23,000

Then I set that net torque equal to 23,000, isolated force of the mass, and divided by 9.8 m/s^2 in order to find the maximum mass. It's still wrong, and I don't know where to go from here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should start from writing down the equations of equilibrium. Don't plug in any numbers just yet, use letters for everything.
 
Just figured it out.


I have to take the 23,000 maximum force into account that is exerted upwards.

So Net Torque=

0(0)(at the Pivot P)+ (-300kg*9.8)(3m) + -x(6m) + 23,000(4/5)

Its 4/5*23,000 because that is how much is being exerted upwards after looking at the triangle.

We solve for x, and divide by 9.8, to get 788 Kg
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top