Torque on a Massful Beam with Load

  • Thread starter Thread starter amdma2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Load Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the torque on a 2.90-meter-long, 390 kg steel beam with a 71 kg worker standing at its end. The initial attempt at calculating torque incorrectly combined the weights without considering the beam's center of gravity. The correct approach involves calculating the torque from both the beam and the worker separately, with the beam's torque being determined by its mass acting at its midpoint. The final torque should be the sum of the torques from both the beam and the worker. Understanding the distribution of forces and drawing a free-body diagram is essential for accurate calculations.
amdma2003
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is the problem I have with the question with a beam with mass.

Homework Statement


A 2.90 -m-long, 390 kg steel beam extends horizontally from the point where it has been bolted to the framework of a new building under construction. A 71.0 kg construction worker stands at the far end of the beam. What is the magnitude of the torque about the point where the beam is bolted into place?


Homework Equations


The equation that I used:
Torque = mgl
where
m = mass
g = 9.8
l = length

As provided by my professor.

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the beam is bolted at the edge, and is horizontal, m=390, and l=2.9
In addition, there is a load applied to the edge of the beam so:
(390 + 71)9.8 * 2.9 = torque

Torque is 13101.62

However, that is wrong, can someone tell me why and what I am doing wrong? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you express your equation as sum of all the torque? Also is the length value same for the beam and the person if you draw a freebody diagram? Another words, is the man standing in the middle or the end? Did you take consideration center of gravity? You need to learn to draw things out, put the arrows pointing down at the right places, it will help you visulize where the force is acting so you can correctly express it in your Net torque equations
 
Last edited:
The sum of the torque is T1+T2, and the person is standing at the edge of the beam. I do know the torque of the person standing at the edge, which is 2.9 * 71 * 9.8 = 2017.82 however, I do not know how to find the torque of the beam.
 
Your stealbeam assuming that it is uniform in mass, it should have its downward force eactly in the middle, think of the stealbeam as a point particle, and all the mass is centered at the center :) that will give you its torque. And the person is standing at the edge at that distance, there is another downward force there. So sum up all the Torque.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks. The torque of the beam is mgl/2. Thats what I forgot.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top