Torques on a Rod - Need Quick Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsguy101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Torques
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the forces and torques acting on a rod. It highlights that while the rod may be in horizontal translational equilibrium, it is not in vertical equilibrium due to a greater downward force. The moments about the center of the rod need to be computed to determine if they sum to zero. The only torque acting on the rod is a counterclockwise torque from the vertical component of a force, which is perpendicular to the radius. Understanding these dynamics is essential for solving the problem effectively.
physicsguy101
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
2labtqs.png



If anyone can give me some quick help on this, I would appreciate it.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsguy101 said:
2labtqs.png
If anyone can give me some quick help on this, I would appreciate it.

Thanks in advance.

I can't quite tell, but it looks like it's possible that the vertical and horizontal components of force could each sum to zero. But what about the moments? Try computing the sum of the moments about the center of the rod. Is it zero?

BBB
 
Well, looking at the horizontal axis only we can assume from the picture that the rod is in translational equilibrium (it doesn't move) along the horizontal axis. But looking in the vertical axis, we see a greater force downwards than the vertical component of F(3), so the rod is actually moving downwards (it's not in vertical translational equilibrium). Even if we assume that the rod is in translational equilibrium both in horizontal and vertical axes due to diagram error, if you call your pivot point the point where F(2) is acting upon, the only torque applied is a counterclockwise torque by the vertical component of F(3), which is perpendicular to a radius extending from the rod = actual torque.

I hope that helps!
 
Thanks guys! I appreciate the help!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why is there are precession frequency here?
Replies
1
Views
838
Torques exerted on a vertical disk by multiple forces
Replies
5
Views
2K
Angular momentum for a bullet and a rod attached to a ceiling
Replies
17
Views
1K
Minimum angular velocity of a point mass on a rotating rod
Replies
5
Views
614
Circular motion question: Mass on a rod rotating in a vertical circle
Replies
4
Views
856
Tension Question for Ship Container and Wind Gust
Replies
12
Views
901
Calculating Net Torque in a Rotating System
Replies
22
Views
3K
Sum of torques, equilibrium problem
Replies
3
Views
2K
Finding the mass of a ball and a rod using torque
Replies
8
Views
2K
Force diagram of two rods hinged together
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top