Torques on a Ruler Homework: Find Unknown Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeachBanana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torques
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a ruler balanced at its center with a 10 g coin at the zero mark and an unknown mass at the 4.7 cm mark, requiring the calculation of the unknown mass for equilibrium. The counterclockwise torque was calculated correctly, but there was confusion regarding the placement of the zero mark and the use of gravitational acceleration. The participant initially calculated the unknown mass as 1.7 g, which seemed incorrect given the positioning of the coins. After further consideration, a revised estimate of approximately 18 g was suggested, aligning with the expectation that the closer mass should be heavier. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying torque principles to solve equilibrium problems.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A centimeter ruler, balanced at its center point, has two coins placed on it, as shown in the figure. One coin, of mass 10 g , is placed at the zero mark; the other, of unknown mass , is placed at the 4.7 cm mark. The center of the ruler is at the 3.0 cm mark. The ruler is in equilibrium; it is perfectly balanced.

Find the unknown mass.

Homework Equations



τ = F * r

The Attempt at a Solution



I set the zero mark to be in a center of the ruler. Then I tried to compute the counterclockwise Torque.

τ = (0.01 kg)(0.03 m)(9.8 m/s^2)

I'm really unsure about using the acceleration due to gravity. Should I have been using τ = Iα instead? I figure if I know how to properly find the counterclockwise torque, the clockwise torque will follow the same method.
 

Attachments

  • RulerTorques.jpg
    RulerTorques.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,408
Physics news on Phys.org
No, your method is fine. The Force term is given by F=mg.

You said you put your zero point in the centre of the ruler. But the question says that the centre is at 3.0cm. Your calculation for the counterclockwise moment is still correct though, as the zero point is 3cm from the fulcrum.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the problem did say to put the zero mark at the end but I thought it would be easier to put it in the middle since I wouldn't have to worry about that force. Here's what I've done so far:

counterclockwise torque = (0.01 kg)(0.03m)(9.8 m/s^2)
counterclockwise torque = 0.00294 N * M

clockwise torque = (x kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.017 m)
0.00294 N * M (I did this because in order for the ruler to be in equilibrium the torques must cancel)= (x kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.017 m)

0.00294 N * M = 0.1666 1/s^2 * (x kg)
x = 0.017 kg

They want the answer in grams though so x = 1.7 g. This doesn't make sense because the second mass is closer to the pivot point which means it must have more mass than 10 g.
 
1kg=1000g :smile:
 
Wowowowowowowowow! Haha, I think ≈ 18 g sounds a bit better.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top