Solving Torricelli's Law: Investigating a Bowl with a Hole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Torricelli's Law to a bowl with a hole, specifically addressing the calculation of drainage time. The user is facing discrepancies between theoretical calculations, which suggest a draining time of 1200 seconds, and experimental results that indicate otherwise. Key equations being utilized include dh/dt*A(h)=-0.6*B*squareroot(2*g*h), with questions raised about the meaning of the function squareroot(1/0.11*h) and the significance of the -0.6 factor. The user seeks clarification on these points and detailed steps to understand the derivation of the 1200 seconds result. Accurate interpretation of the equations and parameters is essential for resolving the issue.
sting10
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ok, I am doing an assignment on torricellis law but I have run into a big problem. I have a bowl which can be described by the function:

squareroot(1/0.11*h). This bowl has a hole in the bottom of a radius of 0.004m. But when I use the relavant formula and integrate it, it says it takes 1200s to drain it. The bowl has a depth of 0.11m. have done experiments and this is far from correct.

Homework Equations



I use the following formula:

dh/dt*A(h)=-0.6*B*squareroot(2*g*h)

where B is the crosssectional area.

I use maple 13 to try to solve it, but it won't give anything reasonable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does squareroot(1/0.11*h) represent? Cross-sectional area?

Also, in dh/dt*A(h)=-0.6*B*squareroot(2*g*h), what's the -0.6 for? Show us in detail how you got 1200 s.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top