Total Charge from Charge Density?

Slusho
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the total charge Q given the charge density ρ(r)=ε0A(4πδ3(r)-π2e-λr/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the solution's steps start with: Q=∫ρdr=ε0A(4π∫δ3(r)dr-λ2∫e-λr(4πr2)/rdr)

What I don't understand is where that 4πr at the end comes from. That last step is only distributing the integrals except for putting that 4πr in there, so it seems to come from nowhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could be a misprint.

ρ is a volume charge density. So, Q =∫ρdV = ∫ρd3r where dV and d3r are different ways to express a volume element.

Q ≠ ∫ρdr.
 
Hmm. Maybe it's a way of simplifying the problem to be one-dimensional from three-dimensional due to inherent symmetry? I doubt it's a typo as this comes from a solutions manual with plenty of errata documents available.
 
The integrand must have the dimensions of charge. But ρdr does not have the dimensions of charge. The quantity dr has the dimensions of length. You need to multiply ρ by volume in order to get charge.

For problems of spherical symmetry, you can take the volume element d3r to be a spherical shell of radius r and thickness dr. This would be appropriate for the second term in your expression for ρ. Can you express the volume of the shell in terms of r and dr?
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top