Total charge given potential V(r)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the total charge given a potential function V(r) expressed in terms of charge Q and a constant a. The problem is situated within the context of electrostatics, specifically involving concepts of electric potential, charge density, and Gauss' law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore deriving charge density from the electric field and potential, with some questioning the correctness of their calculations. There is discussion about integrating charge density over a volume to find total charge and using Gauss' law for alternative approaches. Questions arise regarding the setup of integrals and the interpretation of results.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying their understanding of charge density and the integration process. Some have provided guidance on using spherical coordinates for integration and the implications of limits as radius approaches infinity. There is recognition of errors in derivations, and attempts to correct them are ongoing.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of the Laplace operator and the setup of integrals in spherical coordinates. Participants are also navigating the implications of integrating over infinite space and the convergence of integrals.

Saraphim
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given
[tex]V(r)=\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{1}{r+a},[/tex]

find the total charge.

Homework Equations


[tex]\overline{E}=-\nabla V[/tex]
[tex]\rho=\epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot \overline{E}[/tex]

[tex]\rho=-\epsilon_0 \nabla^2 V[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I started out by finding the charge density [tex]\rho[/tex] from [tex]\overline{E}[/tex], and I got the result:

[tex]\rho(r)=\frac{aQ}{2\pi r(a+r)^3}[/tex]

I might as well have gone with Poisson's equation to start with, but I didn't think of that.

I have, however, no idea how to proceed from here to find the TOTAL charge. I'm assuming I somehow have to integrate over some region (all of space?), but I don't know how to do it. Any pointers at setting up the integral would be appreciated. I should be able to handle it from there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your ρ(r) is wrong. Do not forget that the Laplace operator is not simply the second derivative with respect to the radius.

If you have the proper formula for the charge density, you get the total charge by integrating to the whole space.

The other way is to find E and then applying Gauss' law.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Your ρ(r) is wrong. Do not forget that the Laplace operator is not simply the second derivative with respect to the radius.

I actually found [tex]\rho[/tex] by first getting the [tex]\overline{E}[/tex]-field from the potential and then using Gauss' law in differential form. I actually thought I had [tex]\rho[/tex] right, so I better figure that out before I try and find the total charge.

1. Finding [tex]\overline{E}[/tex]:
[tex]\overline{E} = -\nabla V[/tex]

The potential is constant to [tex]\theta[/tex] and [tex]\Phi[/tex], so their partial derivatives drop out and I get:

[tex]\overline{E}= - \frac{\partial V}{\partial r}\hat{r} = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{1}{(r+a)^2}\hat{r}[/tex]​

Is this correct? Assuming that...

2. Finding [tex]\rho[/tex]:

I utilize Gauss' law in differential form.

[tex]\rho=\epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot \overline{E}=\epsilon_0 \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(r^2 \frac{1}{(r+a)^2}\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{Q}{4\pi}\frac{2r(a+r)-2r^2}{(a+r)^3}=\frac{aQ}{2\pi r(a+r)^3}[/tex]
I went over it all again and I couldn't find the error. Could you give me a pointer?
 
Last edited:
Sorry, my derivation was wrong, yours is correct. Now integrate for a sphere of infinite radius.

ehild
 
Can you give me a pointer for setting up the relevant integral? The only thing I can think of is a triple integral where the relevant r-integral doesn't converge: [tex]\int_0^\infty \frac{1}{r(a+r)^3}dr[/tex]
 
Last edited:
The total charge is the volume integral of the charge density:

[tex]Q_{total}=\int{\rho dV}[/tex]

Use the volume element for spherical coordinates.

ehild
 
Thanks a lot for your help! The total charge is Q. :-)
 
Well done! Just for fun, try it with the Gaussian surface integral of E.


ehild
 
ehild said:
Well done! Just for fun, try it with the Gaussian surface integral of E.

I get stuck doing that. I use Gauss' law in integral form and arrive at this:

[tex]Q_{total} = \epsilon_0 \oint_S \overline{E} \cdot d\overline{a}[/tex]

The field and area elements are everywhere parallel, so I can drop the directions and thus the dot product:

[tex]Q_{total} = \epsilon_0 \oint_S E da = \epsilon_0 \oint_S \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{1}{(r+a)^2}da = \frac{Q}{4 \pi} \oint_S \frac{1}{(r+a)^2} da[/tex]

That's about as nice as it gets, I think, but I don't know how to evaluate that integral. I guess I have to expand it into a double integral somehow. But since the integral is over my gaussian surface, which is a sphere of constant radius, the double integrals should be with respect to [tex]\phi[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex], but how do I get rid of the r's then?

Edit: I'm sure this has something to do with my gaussian surface being at infinity, but I can't see how to procede. If I just let the fraction tend to zero, I get the result that total charge is zero, which is obviously wrong.
 
  • #10
You need to integrate for a sphere of radius R and then take the limit to R-->infinity. Note that a in da in your integral is not the same as the parameter a. Denote it dA instead. What is the surface element in spherical coordinates?
But it is simpler than that in this case.
As the magnitude of the electric field is constant on the surface of a central sphere, you get the integral just by multiplying E(R) with the surface area of the sphere of radius R, don't you?

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K