Total distance traveled question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marioqwe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distance traveled
Marioqwe
Messages
65
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Lets say we have the velocity equation for a particle

v(t) = at^3 - bt^2 + ct^ - d with t between 0 and 5

So, to find its displacement I have to integrate v(t) from 0 to 5, and I understand why.
But if I want to find the total distance traveled, I must find where t is negative and then i integrate according to that. So, I would have something like an integral of v(t) from 0 to 4 minus an integral of v(t) from 4 to 5. But why do we subtract? Can anybody explain that to me? We also consider moving backwards when we calculate the total distance traveled right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marioqwe said:

Homework Statement



Lets say we have the velocity equation for a particle

v(t) = at^3 - bt^2 + ct^ - d with t between 0 and 5

So, to find its displacement I have to integrate v(t) from 0 to 5, and I understand why.
But if I want to find the total distance traveled, I must find where t is negative and then i integrate according to that.
No, your interval for t is [0, 5], so t is never negative. You need to find where v(t) is negative, because that's when the particle is moving backwards.

If you integrate v(t) from 0 to 5 you'll get the displacement, which is the distance between the particle's position at time t = 0 and time t = 5. For example, if the particle started at the origin, then moved right 5 units, then back 7 units, its displacement would be 2 units, but the distance traveled would be 12 units.
Marioqwe said:
So, I would have something like an integral of v(t) from 0 to 4 minus an integral of v(t) from 4 to 5. But why do we subtract? Can anybody explain that to me? We also consider moving backwards when we calculate the total distance traveled right?
Yes.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top