I Total energy of an isolated system

AI Thread Summary
In a closed system where total energy is always zero, it indicates that kinetic and potential energy can transform into each other while maintaining a constant total energy. The concept of zero total energy is flexible, as one can redefine potential energy by adding a constant, making the concern about total energy being zero irrelevant. Energy conservation allows for internal configurations to change, akin to transferring funds between bank accounts, without altering the overall total. However, real-world dissipative forces like friction can diminish energy over time, analogous to bank fees. Understanding these principles helps clarify how systems operate under conservation laws.
Hajarmq
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
If a closed system has kinetic and potential energy such as the total energy (the sum of the two) equals zero for all times, what does that mean? In other words, what does it physically mean that the total energy is always zero for a closed system?
I think I have a small misunderstanding of the interpretation because i ask myself: how can the system do anything at all if its total energy is zero? But at the same time i think, one can choose the zero potential energy such as the total energy is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
If your energy is conserved which means there exist no perturbation from outside the energy environment then you have T+V=E=constant or equivalent dE\dt=0 .So,you have an fixed Energy value which will transform from the kinetic/-to potential energy and vice versa.Therefore both types of energy T and V are using the environment energy/total energy to transform into each other.They try to hold the Balance of the system

Maybe the total Energy could be E=2T-->2T=T+V then we get T=V,but this was one possibility of infinite many configurations.

Every conserved system follows the principle of least action!At this moment you going to know how nature "thinks"😉
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Hajarmq said:
But at the same time i think, one can choose the zero potential energy such as the total energy is zero.
This is the key point. The total energy can be anything you like, since you can add an arbitrary constant to the potential energy - so worrying that the total energy is zero is pointless. Add a constant if it bothers you. :wink: The internal configuration can change, possibly (but not necessarily) trading kinetic energy for potential energy, as long as the total energy remains the same.
 
  • Like
Likes troglodyte and Delta2
The idea is the same as having two bank accounts, one in checking (kinetic energy) and one in savings (potential energy). If you don't deposit or withdraw any money, you can move money from one account to the other and the total (zero of energy) that you have in the accounts together will be the same regardless of what that total is.

Of course in real life the bank may charge you a fee every time you transfer money between accounts so that if you do it enough times, you will be left with nothing. The physical equivalent of that is dissipative forces, such as friction, that reduce the mechanical energy and are always there.

Note that, in both the bank account and physical system examples, if you want to increase what's already there, you got to do some work.
 
  • Like
Likes Hajarmq, troglodyte and Delta2
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top