Total energy of an isolated system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of total energy in a closed system, particularly when the sum of kinetic and potential energy equals zero. Participants explore the implications of this condition and how it affects the system's behavior, touching on concepts of energy conservation and transformations between energy types.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the physical meaning of a closed system having a total energy of zero, expressing confusion about how the system can function under such conditions.
  • Another participant asserts that in a conserved energy system, total energy remains constant, and energy can transform between kinetic and potential forms, suggesting a balance is maintained.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that the total energy can be adjusted by adding a constant to the potential energy, arguing that concerns about total energy being zero are unfounded.
  • One participant uses an analogy of bank accounts to illustrate energy transfer between kinetic and potential forms, noting that external factors like friction can diminish total energy over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of total energy being zero, with no consensus reached on the interpretation or significance of this condition in closed systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the principle of least action and the role of external perturbations in energy conservation, but these concepts remain loosely defined and not fully resolved within the discussion.

Hajarmq
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
If a closed system has kinetic and potential energy such as the total energy (the sum of the two) equals zero for all times, what does that mean? In other words, what does it physically mean that the total energy is always zero for a closed system?
I think I have a small misunderstanding of the interpretation because i ask myself: how can the system do anything at all if its total energy is zero? But at the same time i think, one can choose the zero potential energy such as the total energy is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
If your energy is conserved which means there exist no perturbation from outside the energy environment then you have T+V=E=constant or equivalent dE\dt=0 .So,you have an fixed Energy value which will transform from the kinetic/-to potential energy and vice versa.Therefore both types of energy T and V are using the environment energy/total energy to transform into each other.They try to hold the Balance of the system

Maybe the total Energy could be E=2T-->2T=T+V then we get T=V,but this was one possibility of infinite many configurations.

Every conserved system follows the principle of least action!At this moment you going to know how nature "thinks"😉
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Hajarmq said:
But at the same time i think, one can choose the zero potential energy such as the total energy is zero.
This is the key point. The total energy can be anything you like, since you can add an arbitrary constant to the potential energy - so worrying that the total energy is zero is pointless. Add a constant if it bothers you. :wink: The internal configuration can change, possibly (but not necessarily) trading kinetic energy for potential energy, as long as the total energy remains the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: troglodyte and Delta2
The idea is the same as having two bank accounts, one in checking (kinetic energy) and one in savings (potential energy). If you don't deposit or withdraw any money, you can move money from one account to the other and the total (zero of energy) that you have in the accounts together will be the same regardless of what that total is.

Of course in real life the bank may charge you a fee every time you transfer money between accounts so that if you do it enough times, you will be left with nothing. The physical equivalent of that is dissipative forces, such as friction, that reduce the mechanical energy and are always there.

Note that, in both the bank account and physical system examples, if you want to increase what's already there, you got to do some work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hajarmq, troglodyte and Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K