Total reluctance in a magnetic core

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevinb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Magnetic
kevinb
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am looking for a general explanation of when the total reluctance of a magnetic circuit is not equivalent to the sum of the reluctances if each area. In several examples the text has added 2 areas in parallel and then added the third area. I'm not 100% sure on when this is required.

Homework Equations



I use R=l/(μA) to determine the reluctance of each area, but don't know if/when reluctances need to be added in parallel.

The Attempt at a Solution



For example, if I have a shape like this:
0WZLM.jpg
where the shaded region is air and the rest (the white area) is iron, I calculated the reluctance for the left, middle, right and small air gap. However, is the total the simple addition of them or are the left and right "legs" in parallel?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The center is in series with the two outer loops which are in parallel.

See page 11 of 35 in http://www.ece.msstate.edu/~donohoe/ece3183magnetic_circuits_and_transformers.pdf

or page 29 of 33 in http://www1.mmu.edu.my/~wslim/lecture_notes/Chapter4.pdf

It's a fairly standard magnetic circuit. One must treat the air gap as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you very much. Those two documents were perfect explanations for this particular circuit, but I'll read them further so I gain a better grasp of the general principles as well.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top