Trace and its square of mixed state density operator using integral

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the properties of the mixed state density operator, specifically that the trace of the mixed state, tr(ρ_mixed), equals 1, while the trace of its square, tr(ρ_mixed²), is less than 1. The mixed state density operator is defined as ρ_mixed = (1/2π)∫₀²π dα ρ(ψ). The calculations presented show that tr(ρ_mixed) simplifies correctly to 1, but the attempt to compute tr(ρ_mixed²) reveals an error in the reasoning. The mistake lies in the assumption that the square of the trace behaves the same way as the trace itself, indicating a misunderstanding of the properties of mixed states. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate calculations in quantum mechanics.
xyver
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to show that
tr\left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}\right)=1
tr\left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}^{2}\right)<1
when
<br /> \hat{\rho}_{mixed}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}d \alpha \hat{\rho}(\psi)<br />

Homework Equations


tr\left(\psi\right)= \sum_{n}\langle n|\psi|n\rangle
\hat{\rho}=\sum_{a}\omega_{a}|\psi\rangle\langle \psi|


The Attempt at a Solution


\hat{\rho}_{mixed}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\alpha\hat{\rho}(\psi)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\left[\alpha\right]_{0}^{2\pi}\hat{\rho}(\psi)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\left[2\pi-0\right]\hat{\rho}(\psi)=\hat{\rho}(\psi)<br />
tr\left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}(\psi)\right)= tr\left( \hat{\rho}(\psi)\right)=\sum_{n}\sum_{a}\langle n| \underbrace{\psi_{a}\rangle\langle\psi_{a}}_{=1}|n\rangle=\sum_{n}\langle n|n\rangle=1
tr \left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}^{2}( \psi)\right)= tr\left( \hat{\rho}^{2}(\psi)\right)= tr\left(\hat{\rho}(\psi) \cdot \hat{\rho}(\psi)\right) = \sum_{n}\sum_{a,b} \langle n| \underbrace{\psi_{a}\rangle \langle\psi_{a}}_{=1}| \underbrace{\psi_{b} \rangle\langle\psi_{b}}_{=1}|n\rangle= \sum_{n}\langle n|n\rangle= 1

That`s not correct, at least not the square of the trace.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is my mistake?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top