Transcendental equation from a finite square well potential

user3
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
if I have a transcendental equation such as this one: tan(l a) = -l / sqrt (64/a^2 - l^2 ) Where
l=sqrt(2m(E+V) /hbar^2 ) and 'a' is the width of a finite square well, how can I solve this equation in terms of both l and a. I have successfully graphed the two sides of the equation together by assuming 'a' to be any constant, i.e 1 . but how can I graphically solve it and extract an exact solution for E that includes a.

note: there are supposed to be three bound states:3 different solutions for E
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might help to let ##z = a l## and express the transcendental equation in terms of ##z## alone.

Note: For this type of problem you generally get two different transcendental equations. One for wave functions that are symmetric about the center of the well and one for anti-symmetric functions.
 
letting x = la, I got this http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=tan(x)+and+-x+/+sqrt(64+-+x^2)


but i only have 2 bound states .


here's the question, please tell me what I am doing wrong:

V = infinity for x<0 and V= -Vo = -32hbar^2 / ma^2 for 0<x<a and V= 0 for x>a

I let l = sqrt(2m(E+Vo)/hbar^2) and k = sqrt(-2mE/hbar^2)

from the continuity of ψ at a: Be^(-ka) = Asin(la) (1)

and from the continuity of dψ/dx at a : -kBe^(-ka) = lAcos(la) (2)

divide (1) by (2) to get -l/k = tan(la) (3)

but k^2 + l^2 = 2mVo / hbar^2 , so k = sqrt(64/a^2 - l^2)

put the new k back in (3) to get tan(la) = -l / sqrt(64/a^2 - l^2)

finally let x = la ----> tan(x) = -x / sqrt(64 -x^2)


from which i get only two intersections on the positive y axis.


"Note: For this type of problem you generally get two different transcendental equations. One for wave functions that are symmetric about the center of the well and one for anti-symmetric functions."

TSny, the potential function is not even in this problem so I think it's only one transcendental. equation
 
Oh, I didn't know that you were taking V = ∞ for x<0.

Your work looks correct to me. There are in fact 3 solutions. The third one is difficult to pick up on your graph. Can you find it by regraphing?

Here's a trick I've seen. By squaring both sides of your transcendental equation and using some trig identities, show that the solutions must satisfy

##|\sin (z)| = z/8##

The graph of this is easier to analyze. However, you only want the solutions where you also satisfy the condition that ##\tan (z) <0##.
 
"The graph of this is easier to analyze. However, you only want the solutions where you also satisfy the condition that tan(z)<0. "

but where does this requirement come from?
 
user3 said:
"The graph of this is easier to analyze. However, you only want the solutions where you also satisfy the condition that tan(z)<0. "

but where does this requirement come from?

Look at your original transcendental equation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top