Transformer, flux linkage and emf short question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between magnetic flux, induced EMF, and their phase differences in transformers. It addresses the confusion regarding the behavior of magnetic field strength (B) when current is zero, clarifying that B does not become infinite due to the nature of the equations involved. The graph's sine wave representation of flux is explained through the derivative relationship between flux and EMF, indicating a 90-degree phase difference rather than the expected 180 degrees. This phase difference arises from the mathematical treatment of flux as a phasor, which helps clarify the relationship between the sine and cosine functions. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping transformer operation and electromagnetic induction principles.
thoradicus
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge%20International%20A%20and%20AS%20Level/Physics%20%289702%29/9702_s05_qp_4.pdf

Homework Statement



6b

Homework Equations



flux linkage = BA
B=F/iL

The Attempt at a Solution


from my understanding, if B=F/iL , if the current is zero, shouldn't B be infinite,hence phi infinite or something? As seen in the 1st graph. Why does the graph follow a sine graph instead of phi(max)sin(wt)?

Also, can anyone explain why the phase difference is 90 deg instead of 180? i thought the EMF curve would just follow a cos curve because of the negative sign of faraday's law, hence 180 phase difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thoradicus said:

The Attempt at a Solution


from my understanding, if B=F/iL , if the current is zero, shouldn't B be infinite,hence phi infinite or something? As seen in the 1st graph. Why does the graph follow a sine graph instead of phi(max)sin(wt)?

Apply Ampere's law along a path inside the core where constant H is assumed to follow.

Also, can anyone explain why the phase difference is 90 deg instead of 180? i thought the EMF curve would just follow a cos curve because of the negative sign of faraday's law, hence 180 phase difference.

There is a derivative involved. If the flux is represented as a phasor ψejwt (w = frequency), then E = -dψ/dt = -jwψejwt. The j means there is a 90 degree relationship between the two. You could also see this by taking the derivative of flux assuming it is a sin and you'd end up with a cos, but phasors (and diagram) helps to keep all the relative phases straight.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top