Transformers Turn ratio versus Impedence ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hollumber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio Transformers
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between turn ratio and impedance ratio in transformers, emphasizing that for maximum power transfer, the turn ratio must equal the square root of the impedance ratio. When this relationship does not hold, the equivalent resistance experienced by the primary circuit increases, leading to reduced power in the secondary circuit. The ideal voltage and current ratios remain unchanged, but power losses occur due to additional resistance in the circuit. The analysis of power dissipation involves considering the entire circuit, including the source and load. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing transformer performance.
Hollumber
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This is my first post, so I hope this is in the right section and format.

I've looked all over the web, but I can't find anything that addresses my question clearly.

I know that for an ideal transformer to not lose any power, the turn ratio has to be the square root of the impedence ratio. My question is what happens when this is not the case? I would think the voltage and current ratios wouldn't be affected because of the nature of a transformer, but this means that one of the impedences would have to magically change to match to I and V on its respective side.

Basically, if (NP/NS)^2 = RP/RS for max power efficiency, what happens when this isn't true?

Thanks in advance,
Hollumber
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After researching this so much, I finally realized where I was going wrong.

(NP/NS)^2 = RP/RS is used to calculate the turn ratio of the transformer to get max power to the load resistor (RS).

If this ratio doesn't hold true, then Req = RS(NP/NS)^2, where Req is the equivalent resistance that the primary circuit (which includes the voltage source) will experience, resulting in lower power in the secondary circuit (containing the load resistor).
 
You can think of it in terms of an equivalent circuit. Losses can be modeled by an equivalent resistance in series with (or in parallel across) the secondary of an ideal transformer. The transformer impedance ratio is still the square of the turns ratio. The power dissipation can be found by analyzing the behavior of the entire circuit, including the source and its internal resistance, the transformer (ideal transformer plus loss resistance), and the load circuit. I and V across the ideal transformer element still have the ideal ratio, but some of the power is dissipated in the loss resistance and doesn't make it into the load.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top