Transition Rates / Squared Dirac Delta

MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71
I am not understanding something from my textbook. This is related to Fermi's Golden rule. It's about what happens when the matrix element of the perturbation H' ends up being a Dirac delta for chosen normalization. Here is Fermi's Golden rule.
\Gamma_{ba} = 2\pi \left|\langle b \mid H'\mid a \rangle \right|^2 \delta\left(\omega_a - \omega_b \right)
I don't understand what is meant by "...is the decay rate into all the particles in the volume V. The number of particles in V is V/(2\pi)^3."
 

Attachments

  • AbersDeltaSquared.png
    AbersDeltaSquared.png
    38.5 KB · Views: 603
Physics news on Phys.org
You can check for why that V/2pi^3 appears here:
http://www2.ph.ed.ac.uk/~gja/qp/qp12.pdf
in the 2nd page.
In fact since in the momentum space the volume is such as he proves it, the number of particles will be the inverse.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
\delta({\bf 0})=V/(2\pi)^3.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
960
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top