Translate into scientific notation?

AI Thread Summary
A charge of +45 microcoulombs (uC) translates into scientific notation as 4.5 x 10^-5 coulombs. The "u" in microcoulombs denotes a factor of 1 x 10^-6, indicating that microcoulombs are one millionth of a coulomb. Therefore, 3 uC equals 3 x 10^-6 coulombs, simplifying the representation of small values. This notation helps in easily expressing both small and large numbers without cumbersome notation. Understanding these conversions is essential for clarity in scientific communication.
KraYzie
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I pretty much know how to solve this problem, but I have a simple question.

The question asks a charge of +45 uC (u is coefficient of friction and C is Columb). Now what would that translate into scientific notation?

Because I know 3 uC equals 3.0 x 10^-6, but what about double figures? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you could write it as 45 x 10-6. standard notation would be 4.5 x 10-5. The mu in the units has nothing to do with the coefficient of friction. It denotes micro which means 1 x 10-6 times the units. In your question for example the units are microcoulombs which are 1 millionth of a coulomb. A micrometer is 1 millionth of a meter.
 
why does 3uC equal 3 x 10^-6?
 
Like I've said the u (mu) that joins onto the units means that they are a millionth of a Coulomb. So in SI units 3uC are 3x10-6 Coulomb's. It makes it easier to write down small and large numbers because you don't have to add the x10 stuff.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top