Transmission probability of a massive particle

mnky9800n
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the potential V=V_0 d[\delta(x-a)+\delta(x-a)]. Find the transmission probability of the potential for a particle of mass m and wave number \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}} incident on the potential. Discuss the behavior when ka~\pi/2.

Homework Equations


Schrodinger's Equation
H\psi=E\psi

The Attempt at a Solution



The solutions to SE for each region are as follows:
region 1: a < x
\psi_1 = e^{ikx}+Re^{-ikx}
region 2: -a < x < a
\psi_2 = Ae^{ikx}+Be^{ikx}
region 3: a < x
\psi_3 = Te^{ikx}

Because the \delta-function means the wave function is continuous but the derivative is not at x = a we can say:

\psi_1(-a) = \psi_2(-a)
\psi_2(a) = \psi_3(a)

therefore:

1+Re^{2ika} = A+Be^{2ika}
A+Be^{-2ika} = T

This is where I get stuck. I have no idea where to go from here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have 4 unknowns, so you need two more equations to be able to solve for them. Those equations come from considering the derivatives of the wave functions. Integrate the Schrodinger equation between a-ε and a+ε. In the limit as ε→0, you'll get a relationship between the derivatives on the two sides of the delta function. Do the same thing around x=-a. Then you should be in a position to solve for the coefficients.

I'd go into more detail, but I don't have time right now. It's probably done in your book somewhere, or someone else may come by to provide more help if you can't figure it out.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top