Transmisson and Reflection (Quantum)

  • Thread starter Thread starter HelenaNikolai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Reflection
HelenaNikolai
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a 12.0eV electrons approach a potential barrier of height 4.2eV.

For what barrier thickness is the reflection at a maximum?

Known:
v_0=6.7*10^(-19)J
E=1.9*10^(-18)J
m=9.11*10^(-31)kg
hbar=1.055*10^(-34)J*s
(I have converted from eV to J to make the units work)

Homework Equations


T=(1+(v_0)^2/(4E(E-V0))sin2(qL))^(-1)
q=sqrt(2m(E-v_0))/hbar
T+R=1
(Where T is the transmission probability and R is the Reflection)

The Attempt at a Solution


q=sqrt(2m(E-v_0))/hbar=sqrt(2(9.11*10^(-34))((1.9*10^(-18)-6.7*10^(-19)))/(1.055*10^(-34)

so then q=1.42*10^10
I plugged in q into my equation for T and then the v_0 and the E for the electron. I set all of it equal to zero, but I think that's my downfall. Conceptually T cannot be zero because L would have to reach infinity. I am not sure what is means by R being a maximum (aka L is a minimum) without setting T=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
T will not vanish even if L goes to infinity. This should make sense since the particle has more energy than the barrier height.

Try looking for when T is minimized, not 0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top