Treble and bass audio controls w/o phase shift?

AI Thread Summary
Treble and bass controls in audio equipment typically introduce a phase shift due to their reliance on RC networks. Analog circuits without phase shift are challenging to achieve, as active filters and crossovers still result in some phase alteration. Digital solutions can provide "phaseless" boosts, but improper design can lead to phase issues. While using a DSP for simple bass and treble adjustments may seem excessive, some audiophiles might still prefer it despite concerns about digital audio quality. The potential for a product that cancels out phase shifts caused by speaker movement could attract interest in the market.
Bob S
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
8
Simple treble and bass controls in audio equipment use RC networks that have a phase shift equal to a radian per neper, or about 6.6 degrees per dB of boost or attenuation. Are there analog treble or bass control circuits that have no phase shift?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Could you use active filters to pass the frequencies you want? Maybe use a high pass filter to attenuate the low frequencies and a low pass to attenuate the high frequencies.
 
Active crossovers still give some phase shift. The only "phaseless" boost at certain frequencies would have to be done digitally, but there are phase shifts involved there if not designed properly. Unless applying a DSP from a digital source to the next component, a DAC/DSP/ADC seems to be overkill for bass and treble only.

Still, some audiophiles might buy it, in spite of the fact that "all digital is bad", selling something that can dynamically cancel out the natural phase shift caused by woofer woofer movement ("Doppler effect") could be a big hit.

Just a matter of adding in your bass and treble controls while you are at it. :P
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top