Triple Integral: Find Region of Intersecting Cylinders

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
I like to use cartesian coords

Find the region to the intersecting cyclinders x^2+y^2<=a^2 and x^2+z^2<=a^2

What I have trouble finding is the domain of integration

Currently I have
a to -a for dx
-srt(a^2-x^2) to srt(a^2-x^2) for dy
-srt(x^2+y^2) to srt(x^2+y^2) for dz

But this integration turned out to be too complicated to evaluate hence probably wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Find the region to ..." ? I assume you mean to find the volume of that region.
It's not at all clear to me where you would get "-srt(x^2+y^2) to srt(x^2+y^2) for dz". I don't see any reason to think that z2 is ever equal to x2+ y2. The projection of the figure down on to the xy-plane is the circle x2+ y2= a2 so, yes, the outer integrals would be
\int_{x= -a}^a \int_{y=-\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}^{\sqrt{a^2- x^2}} dydx

But, for every (x,y), z ranges between -\sqrt{a^2- x^2} and \sqrt{a^2- x^2} also. Looks to me like the inner integral should be
\int_{z= -\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}^{\sqrt{a^2-z^2}}dz
Of course, that could be done simply as the double integral
2\int_{x= -a}^a \int_{y=-\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}^{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}\sqrt{a^2- x^2}dydx

I think it would be even simpler in polar coordinates
 
I see how you got your solution which yields the correct solution, 16a^3/3.

I eventually used a different method but is slightly wrong with a factor of 'a' too much. I integrated along one cyclinder along one axis and then specified the limits of the other two axis as -a and a. My integral from the inside out is
From -(x^2+z^2) to x^2+z^2 along y
From -a to a along x
From -a to a along z

I got 16a^4/3. Where did I go wrong?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top