Triple integration over portion of Sphere

nysnacc
Messages
184
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2016-10-3_19-5-13.png


Homework Equations


spherical Jacobean

The Attempt at a Solution


I have (sorry, have to capture my work, too hard to type)
upload_2016-10-3_19-6-20.png


then the integration of p3 ep2 = 1/2 ep2 (p2-3/2) ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer I got using cylindrical was eπ/8,
but here, using the spherical, I got π(e+3)/64
 
nysnacc said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 106917

Homework Equations


spherical Jacobean

The Attempt at a Solution


I have (sorry, have to capture my work, too hard to type)
View attachment 106918

****************************************************************
Your material is NOT too hard to type; you just need to learn how to use LaTeX. That does take some effort, though.
*****************************************************************

then the integration of p3 ep2 = 1/2 ep2 (p2-3/2) ??

No. You can check that for yourself, by showing that the derivative is not ##r^3 \exp(r^2)##.

Do integration by parts.

BTW: I get ##\pi/8## using spherical coordinates.
 
π/8 not πe/8 ?
 
nysnacc said:
π/8 not πe/8 ?

I wrote exactly what I meant.

If you had a different upper bound of ##r = a## instead of ##r = 1## you would, indeed, get an exponential in the answer.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top