Triple Integration: Transform Equation to Spherical Coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on transforming a complex integral from Cartesian to spherical coordinates, specifically for calculating the electric field due to a Gaussian charge distribution. Participants clarify the meaning of variables such as \vec{x}, \vec{x'}, and \vec{x}_0, with \vec{x'} representing the integration variable as a position vector. The integral's limits extend to infinity, and the volume element is confirmed as d^3x' = dx' dy' dz'. One user suggests using the electric potential for easier integration, leading to a potential expression involving the same Gaussian charge density. The conversation highlights the challenges of handling the Gaussian function within the integral transformation.
big_gie
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Transform the equation from cartesians coordinates to spherical coordinates.


Homework Equations


\int_\infty\int_\infty\int_\infty<br /> exp\left\{<br /> \frac{-\left| \vec{x&#039;}-\vec{x}_0 \right|^2}{2 \sigma}<br /> \right\}<br /> \frac{\left( \vec{x} - \vec{x&#039;} \right)}{\left| \vec{x} - \vec{x&#039;} \right|^{3}} d^3x&#039;<br />


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confused by the \vec{x}, \vec{x&#039;} and \vec{x}_0... I know it can be done: nothing depends on the angle here, so I should just get something depending on \vec{r}.

Thank you for any hints...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm equally confused by your integrand expression. It's supposed to be dxdydz isn't it? And what are the limits of your integration? And what does x' mean as both a scalar variable or vector function variable?
 
Hi Defennder, thanks for your reply.

Yes, d^3x&#039; is indeed dx&#039;~dy&#039;~dz&#039;: a volume element.

The integration is over infinity.

\vec{x&#039;} is the integration variable. It is a position vector (x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;).

Maybe I'll explain more the problem...

The integral is the electric field at position \vec{x}, caused by a charge distribution of gaussian shape:
\vec{E}\left(\vec{x}\right) = <br /> k \int_{x&#039;=-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{y&#039;=-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{z&#039;=-\infty}^{\infty}<br /> \rho\left(\vec{x&#039;}\right) \frac{\vec{x} - \vec{x&#039;}}{\left| \vec{x} - \vec{x}&#039;\right|^3} ~dx&#039;~dy&#039;~dz&#039;
<br /> \rho\left(\vec{x}\right) &amp; = &amp; \rho_0 \exp\left(<br /> -\frac{\left(\vec{x} - \vec{x_0}\right)^2}{2 \sigma^2}<br /> \right)<br />
where:
\vec{x} is the position where the field is wanted;
\vec{x&#039;} is the integration variable;
\vec{x_0} is the particle center;
\sigma is the particle width.

I think I'll use the potential instead, for an easier integration:
\vec{E}\left(\vec{x}\right) = - \nabla \phi\left(\vec{x}\right)
<br /> \phi\left(\vec{x}\right) = <br /> k \int_{x&#039;=-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{y&#039;=-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{z&#039;=-\infty}^{\infty}<br /> \rho\left(\vec{x&#039;}\right) \frac{1}{\left| \vec{x} - \vec{x}&#039;\right|} ~dx&#039;~dy&#039;~dz&#039;<br />

I've done a variable change for \vec{x} - \vec{x}&#039; but then I'm stuck in the gaussian...

Thanx for any hints.

(Sorry if any mistakes have slipped, I'm writting this from memory and it's getting late...)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top