I've just started looking at Rudin (Real and complex analysis, the big one) in which he offers the following definition (1.2):(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

a)A collection [tex] \tau[/tex] of subsets of a set X is said to be atopology in Xif [tex] \tau [/tex] has the following three properties:

i) [tex]\emptyset \in \tau [/tex] and [tex]X \in \tau [/tex]

ii) If [tex]V_{i}\in\tau[/tex] for i=1,[tex] \cdots [/tex],n, then [tex]V_{1} \cap V_{2} \cap \cdots \cap V_{n} \in \tau[/tex]

iii) If {[tex]V_{a}[/tex]} is an arbitrary collection of members of [tex]\tau[/tex] (finite, countable or uncountable) then [tex]\bigcup_{\alpha}V_{\alpha}\in \tau[/tex].

b)if [tex] \tau[/tex] is a topology in X, then X is called a topological space, and the members of X are called the open sets in X.

(Apologies for the random superscripts, I'm not sure why LaTeX felt they were necessary).

By considering the set {X, [tex]\emptyset[/tex]} doesn't this make every set a topological space? The first condition is obviously satisfied, the union of the empty set and any other set X is X, and the intersection of X with the empty set is the empty set... right?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Trivial topology on an arbitrary set?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Trivial topology arbitrary |
---|

I Proving that an action is transitive in the orbits |

I Metrics and topologies |

A Can I change topology of the physical system smoothly? |

A Can I find a smooth vector field on the patches of a torus? |

A Integration along a loop in the base space of U(1) bundles |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**