Trouble Understanding How to Apply Kirchhoff's Laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter gibberingmouther
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply Laws
AI Thread Summary
Understanding Kirchhoff's Laws and circuit analysis can be challenging, especially when trying to determine currents and voltage drops in complex circuits. The discussion highlights difficulties in applying these laws, particularly in identifying parallel and series connections among resistors. Clarification is provided on the relationships between resistors, emphasizing that R34 is not in parallel with R2 but is instead parallel with R1. The importance of practicing with specific component values rather than variables is noted, as it aids in grasping the concepts better. Overall, mastering circuit solving requires practice and familiarity with the underlying principles of electrical circuits.
gibberingmouther
Messages
120
Reaction score
15
Homework Statement
Finding currents through resistors
Relevant Equations
R(eq. parallel) = (1/R1 + 1/R2 + …)^-1 and R(eq. series) = (R1 + R2 + …) and E=IR
I'm taking a break from music for a few days because I do that sometimes, and it's like a rule for me, and I usually listen to music when doing my physics homework. I'm realizing I have a little more trouble without that boost I get. But it could also be that what I'm trying to do is hard. I think I really need to work on circuit solving if I want to get a B in this class.

The specific circuit I was having trouble with is:
241054

I don't think I need to include the specific values, but the battery voltage and the resistance values for each resistor are given.

I tried breaking the circuit up into loops, but that doesn't seem to work very well. The problem asks what the currents going through each resistor are. I don't know how to find those values or the voltage drops.

I guess I can find the voltage drops if I can find the currents - because they would just be the currents times the given resistances, right? R34 is in parallel with R2 and R234 is in parallel with R1. So V34 = V2 and V234 = V1? Is V134 = V2?

Is I3 = I4 = I(eq.) for the entire circuit?

If somebody could help me understand how to apply E = IR along with the rules for parallel and series circuits that would help immensely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are serveral methods to solve this problem. Perhaps it is better to know which method your professor expects you to use. Is it mentioned in the problem statement?

Also, it will be easier to work it out with the given component values instead of using variable names.
 
gibberingmouther said:
The specific circuit I was having trouble with is:
View attachment 241054
I don't think I need to include the specific values, but the battery voltage and the resistance values for each resistor are given.

I tried breaking the circuit up into loops, but that doesn't seem to work very well. The problem asks what the currents going through each resistor are. I don't know how to find those values or the voltage drops.

I guess I can find the voltage drops if I can find the currents - because they would just be the currents times the given resistances, right? R34 is in parallel with R2 and R234 is in parallel with R1. So V34 = V2 and V234 = V1? Is V134 = V2?

No, R34 (the series equivalent of R3 and R4 ) is not parallel with (Edit:)R2. Two resistors are connected in parallel if they have two pairs of terminals in common, but one terminal of R2 is connected to the positive terminal of the source.
But R1 is parallel with R34.
241064


The red dot is common for all the tree resistors, but the blue one is common for R1 and R34 only.

gibberingmouther said:
Is I3 = I4 = I(eq.) for the entire circuit?
No
 
Last edited:
ehild, you said that R34 is not in parallel with R1 but R1 is in parallel with R34? Is that what you meant to say? My understanding was that if two resistors are in parallel, then they are in parallel to each other. Did you mean to say R2 is in parallel with R34?
 
gibberingmouther said:
ehild, you said that R34 is not in parallel with R1 but R1 is in parallel with R34? Is that what you meant to say? My understanding was that if two resistors are in parallel, then they are in parallel to each other. Did you mean to say R2 is in parallel with R34?
Sorry, I meant R34 is not parallel with R2.
 
  • Like
Likes gibberingmouther
I had trouble for awhile, but I think I get it now thanks to an electronics site I found and the hints on Pearson. I just need to do some practice problems so I'm less likely to make mistakes when I take the final exam, because solving these circuits sometimes involves a lot of steps and algebra.

Figuring out how to do this is so far the hardest thing I've done in my two physics courses, even though the rules you're supposed to use seem so simple. I've had an easier time with complicated formulas that use calculus than with solving circuits.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top