Trouble with Simple Harmonic Motion

AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion (SHM), a particle is in equilibrium at the center of its path because the net force and acceleration are zero there. At the ends of its path, the particle experiences maximum displacement and a restoring force that pulls it back toward the center, meaning it is not in equilibrium. The statement that acceleration at the ends of the path must be greater than g is incorrect; it can vary depending on the restoring force. Equilibrium can be classified as stable or unstable, with stable equilibrium occurring at the center where any small displacement results in a force that restores the particle to its position. Therefore, equilibrium in SHM is defined by the absence of net force at the center, not at the ends.
shawonna23
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with this question:

1. A particle oscillating in simple harmonic motion is:

in equilibrium at the center of its path because the acceleration is zero there

or

in equilibrium at the ends of its path because the acceleration is zero there


2. When a body executes simple harmonic motion, its acceleration at the ends of its path must be: more than g

Is this statement correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shawonna23 said:
I am having trouble with this question:

1. A particle oscillating in simple harmonic motion is:

in equilibrium at the center of its path because the acceleration is zero there

or

in equilibrium at the ends of its path because the acceleration is zero there
For SHM there must be a restoring force, pulling the object back to the center of its path. The greater the displacement from the center, the greater the force. (Consider a spring.) Use this information to determine which answer is correct.
2. When a body executes simple harmonic motion, its acceleration at the ends of its path must be: more than g

Is this statement correct?
No. The acceleration depends on the strength of the restoring force at the end of the path. It might be greater than g, but certainly doesn't have to be.
 
Thanks, the answers is:
in equilibrium at the center of its path
 
What is meant by "equilibrium"? If it means "no net force", that happens at the centre of the path. If it means "stationary", that happens at the ends.
 
James R said:
What is meant by "equilibrium"? If it means "no net force", that happens at the centre of the path. If it means "stationary", that happens at the ends.

Equilibrium means that if you placed an object in a certain postion, the net force acting on that particle is zero and it would remain at rest. This is not the case at the ends. If you place the object there, the spring will always pull it back toward the point of zero force.

Equilibrium can be stable or unstable. It is stable if a small displacement results in an unbalanced force that tends to pull it back. It is unstable if a small displacement results in a force that tends to push it farther away, like trying to balance a pencil in its point.
 
Basically equilibrium does not take place in SHM.But Net force is zero at the centre but not at the two ends.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top