Trying to compare two different weights during drop test

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing the drop test survivability of two parts weighing 10 pounds and 13 pounds, both packaged in foam. The user has data indicating that the 10-pound part survives a drop from 5 feet, but seeks to extrapolate this to the 13-pound part without direct testing. Initial calculations involve kinetic energy and foam deflection, but the user struggles with incorporating the foam's damping effect. Suggestions include estimating foam deflection and assuming linear behavior for calculations, while also considering the energy involved in the drop. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately predicting outcomes based on varying weights and foam properties.
Spoolx
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I am working on a project at work where we make part a which weighs 10 pounds and part b which weighs 13 pounds.

Parts a and b both get packaged in a foam container. I have test data on part a that says it will survive drop tests, I was hoping to do analysis to say part b will also survive the drop test without actually having to test part b.
The drop height is 5 feet. The foam has a specification where it takes 90lbf to deflect it .25 inch

My initial calculation was to find the kinetic energy of both, and then divide by the displacement to find the force, however obviously the foam padding adds some sort of damping to the equation. So I really don't know how to solve this problem.
When I do my KE equation I can't figure out how to get rid of the ft from the numerator as I need lbs to calculate deflection of the foam.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How much does the foam deflect during the 10lb drop test?

Perhaps you could first assume an amount of foam is required (i.e 1.5 inches needed to stop the object), then use the amount of foam deflection as your deceleration distance, find a, then find the force from your f=ma. Of course this would require a few iterations until the force you find matches up with the force required to displace said amount of foam. And this is also assuming the foam behaves linearly with respect to force and displacement ( 90lbf = 0.25in, 180lbf = 0.5in, 270lbf = 0.75in, ect.), which may not be realistic, but is something you could possibly assume depending on how it acted in the 10lb drop test.

Or maybe this is a gross oversimplification. Let's see if I get torn apart.
 
I'm not sure if my calculations below are right. In any case, a drop of five feet is a substantial drop, and 10 or 13 pounds are substantial masses...

In SI units, 90 lbf are 90*0,453*9,8 = 400 N. Now, the energy associated with a displacement of that force along 0,25 inch = 0,00635 m is 400 * 0,00635 = 2,54 joule.

Now, if you drop a mass of 10 pounds (4,53 kg) from a height of 5 feet (1,52 m) it will collide with the floor with an energy m*g*h = 4,53*9,8*1,52 = 67 joule...
 
One more question: How much foam are you allowed?
 
Spoolx said:
Hi guys,
I am working on a project at work where we make part a which weighs 10 pounds and part b which weighs 13 pounds.

Parts a and b both get packaged in a foam container. I have test data on part a that says it will survive drop tests, I was hoping to do analysis to say part b will also survive the drop test without actually having to test part b.
The drop height is 5 feet. The foam has a specification where it takes 90lbf to deflect it .25 inch

My initial calculation was to find the kinetic energy of both, and then divide by the displacement to find the force, however obviously the foam padding adds some sort of damping to the equation. So I really don't know how to solve this problem.
When I do my KE equation I can't figure out how to get rid of the ft from the numerator as I need lbs to calculate deflection of the foam.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks

What kind of parts are they? Is their construction (shape, size, material, etc.) identical except for the weight?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top