Trying to find the Tensile Pressure in a Rotating Disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tensile pressure in a hyper-fast rotating aluminum disk to determine its maximum spin speed before failure due to centrifugal force. The initial calculations involve deriving the infinitesimal outward force from concentric rings of material and integrating this force to find the total force at a specific radius. However, the resulting pressure calculation shows an unrealistic infinite value at the center, prompting a need to consider hoop stress in addition to radial stress. The conversation suggests balancing centrifugal force against hoop stress and references a differential equation for thin disks as a potential solution. The discussion concludes with a recommendation to consult a specific engineering text for further insights on the topic.
axemaster
Messages
58
Reaction score
7
OK, so I'm trying to build a hyper-fast rotating disk, probably of aluminum. The tensile strength is about 200MPa (note that this is a pressure, which makes sense), and I'm trying to calculate the tensile pressure throughout the disk. The point being to find out how fast I can spin the thing before it tears apart due to the centifugal force. To phrase it more succinctly:

A disk of radius R and mass density ρ rotates about its axis with angular frequency ω. Find the tensile pressure at radius r_o.

So I started out by finding the infinitesimal outward force exerted by successive rings of material:

v=ωr
a=v^{2}/r

→ a=ω^{2}r

And the mass of each ring is:

→ dm=2\pi rh*ρ*dr ---------- note that "h" is the thickness, included to make it a volume

The infinitesimal force on each ring segment is then:

dF=dm*a

→ dF=2\pi r^2 ω^2 h ρ dr

Now I integrated the force from the radius of interest r_o, to the outer radius "R". This should give us the total force the material must withstand at radius r_o.

F=\int^{R}_{r_o} 2\pi r^2 ω^2 h ρ dr

F=2\pi ω^2 h ρ (\frac{R^3}{3}-\frac{r^{3}_{o}}{3})

When plotted in Mathematica (setting all variables to 1 and varying r_o) this looks like:

forcecurve2_zps84100d69.jpg


This appears to be correct. As one might expect, the force starts at zero on the outer edge and increases to a more or less constant value at the center.

The trouble starts when I tried to convert this into a pressure by dividing by the area at r_o.

→ A=2\pi r_o h

→ Pressure=F/A=\frac{ω^2 ρ (\frac{R^3}{3}-\frac{r^{3}_o}{3})}{r_o}

pressure_zps217ec2ea.jpg


As you can see, the pressure goes to infinity at the center. This is clearly wrong, but I'm not sure how to fix it. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to consider successive rings you must consider the hoop (circumferential) stress in each ring cause by the rotation.

To do this you balance the centrifugal force against twice the hoop force for a semi ring.
The ring bursts across a diameter, cutting two sections of ring. The free body diagram of the semi ring has the outwards centrifugal pressure colinear with but of opposite direction to the hoop stresses in that cut semi ring.

Divide this by the ring cross section to obtain the bursting stress.

Alternatively for thin disks you can solve the differential equation

r(d2σr/dr2)+3(dσr/dr) = -(3+γ)ρω2r

I am sorry I do not have my usual facilities for drawings or tex.
 
Last edited:
Pity, because in a ring both the radial AND the circumferential stress contribute to resist the centrifugal force, and worse, they interfere also through Poisson's number.

The circumferential stress is what keeps the stress finite at the center, but both stresses act.

If you read German the result is in Dubbel but I don't remember if the reasoning is included.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/3540221425/?tag=pfamazon01-20
wait, it has been translated into English!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387198687/?tag=pfamazon01-20
try to get one, not just for the present purpose. Got mine on eBay.
 
You have given me some very good advice, I think I know how to solve this now. I'll get back to you in a bit with my results...
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top